walter_bishop
Joined 10 years ago
Joined 10 years ago
What was the name of this activist and why should we believe anything in that article.
"I have always felt it as a stroke of good fortune that early in life, at about the age of fifteen, I lighted, in my fathers library, on a copy of Kant's Prolegomena to any Future Metaphysics. The book made at the time a powerful and inextinguishable impression on me, the like of which I never afterwards experienced in any of my philosophical reading. Some two or three years later the superfluity of the thing in itself abruptly dawned upon me. On a bright summer day in the open air, the world with my ego suddenly appeared to me as one coherent mass of sensations, only more strongly coherent in the ego. Although the actual working out of this thought did not occur until a later period, yet the moment was decisive for my whole view. I still had to straggle long and hard before I was able to retain the new conception in my special subject. With the valuable parts of physical theories we necessarily assume a good dose of false metaphysics, which it is very difficult to sift out from what should be preserved, especially when those theories have become very familiar to us. At times, too, the traditional, instinctive views would arise with great power and place impediments in my way. Only by alternate studies in physics and the physiology of the senses, and by historico-physical investigations (since about 1863) and after having endeavoured in vain to settle the conflict by a physico-psychological monadology (in my lectures on psychophysics...) have I attained to any considerable stability in my views." from 'the Analysis of Sensations'
https://meshedinsights.com/2016/11/22/microsoft-linux-patent...
http://blog.trendmicro.com/trendlabs-security-intelligence/b...
illogical Captain :)
"In the past web browsers in have been very secure by default .. the likelyhood of exploits targeting JavaScript and browsers is bound to grow."
Google on ActiveX exploits ..
I used watch those Dawkins v the true believers videos and I suspect such opinions are promoted to discredit Darwinian Evolution acting on the genome. Regardless of the unknown nuances of DNA, Evolution is the environment acting on the species to further adapt it to the environment. Here's another quote from Philip Ball: "What often goes unremarked among the revisionism that current research is prompting is that DNA was supposed to be the missing part of the puzzle in evolutionary theory: the repository of Mendelian hereditary factors."
So if DNA doesn't act on the units of inheritance, there must be some kind of spooky spirit entities acting on matter,
http://www.sciencecartoonsplus.com/images/miracle_sharris.gi...
http://www.philipball.co.uk/images/stories/docs/pdf/genes%20...
"While connected to the existing infrastructure, the radio switches to base station mode for offering INDEPENDENT communication to other users in GLOBAL network as well"
http://hfindustry.com/meetings_presentations/presentation_ma...
btw: Whatever happened to that low earth orbit satellite system that was going to provide Internet anywhere on the planet.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_787_Dreamliner_battery_...
If 'human behaviour' hasn't evolved along with homo sapiens then what do you propose as the source, and if you invoke some non-corporeal entity then please get thee to a pulpit :)