vuggamie
Joined 1 year ago
Joined 1 year ago
But I guess unlimited resources wasn't really the problem, was it?
In my personal life, I don't touch it.
Unless replaced by something far more capable, refinements and incremental improvements will continue to be applied to LLMs. They will become less expensive and more specialized. Machine learning and neural networks are part of the software stack. LLMs will continue to grow and improve for the foreseeable future.
$200 claude max through work -- pricing may be different, they don't show me the invoices
Economics is an imperfect science.
Can Claude replace you? Have LLMs altered the software developer productivity equation?
In 1987, Fred Brooks wrote [1]:
"But, as we look to the horizon of a decade hence, we see no silver bullet. There is no single development, in either technology or in management technique, that by itself promises even one order-of-magnitude improvement in productivity, in reliability, in simplicity."
Most companies do not measure software developer productivity. I have never been part of an organization that does.
Will it collapse the economy? The last innovation to collapse the economy was credit default swaps. This says more about the economic systems we have built than technology or progress.
No one knows what is going to happen. But humans are still necessary for every stage of labor, and software developers are still necessary for making software.
[1] https://www.cgl.ucsf.edu/Outreach/pc204/NoSilverBullet.html
Same reason why I have no interest in working weekends. Is the CEO going to come by my house on Saturday and mow my lawn? Wait, HR said we were family...
His first communication reduced trust: "It is a privilege to lead an organization with a long history of standing up for people and building technology that puts them first."
Now let's put people first by making Firefox an AI first browser. Enzor-Demeo would have made an excellent Microsoft product manager. Too bad he didn't get the job.