volume
Joined 13 years ago
Joined 13 years ago
I think one needs to unravel our inner state and psychology ... we cannot simply turn on and off. But then, once we understand our inner state/psychology it makes it easier to turn on/off.
I see the authors (Sheila Dang, Paresh Dave and Katie Paul) quote "sources".
When I read it, "our most provocative thinkers and writers" made me wonder:
- Given any system don't you have a range of rigid versus loose followers? This looks true from my own observations of the note talking community. - Couldn't normies those who are not "our most provocative thinkers and writers" get value out of such systems? - Is Sasha aspiring to be one of "our most provocative thinkers and writers"? He wants to make his mark on the world so part of this writing is self talk.
Sasha accomplishes his goal. it's provocative writing and has produced a decent HN response. I have no evidence he means what he says because if so, it's a topic of personal preference. Fun and interesting but not immediately valuable (to me).
What if in fact Amazon uses EMC gear underneath
> There is no noise here, just socially acceptable noise.
> This can obviously be fixed with good documentation, but in reality, no one has good enough docs.
One problem I've witnessed related to documentation about on-call issues is the over reliance on the SOP concept. They only commit to one level or one pass of analyzing the issue. They do not future drill down, either by linking to other notes or reviewing the issues deliberately. It's like they read about the 5 Whys and decided why not just 1 why.
Does this apply to Brave browser?