vkhn

Apologies, but regardless of being one sided, there is no acceptable professional reason to shout at someone in a meeting.

I’m not sure why you are writing this take, but I’m not sure how this is constructive.

One thing to note is power isn’t consistently generated M from the same source. Sometimes more wind, sometimes more solar, sometimes more gas. There’s currently a surplus of wind power overnight in that region and There are several companies teaming up with utilities to shift EV charging to lower cost, lower CO2 producing times.

This is a very complex problem to measure.

Except if you’re a pattern day trader (even with more than 25k) in which case you get the middle finger and nothing. Zero interest. Which is ridiculous because they make more money on these people.

On thought #2, I'm with you. While I'm planning to retire early (thanks to software, I will have the money, and not much brain power left), I have yet to figure out what the heck I want to do, and I won't retire until I figure that out.

I also think the "financially independent" life has a pretty wide definition. I don't need a job for an alarmingly long time, but couldn't retire on what I have. It still gives me enough freedom to work where I want, when I want - which is what proponents of this life talk about.

In college I built a project that could reasonably well predict the key of a given piece based on the distribution of note usage. For example, most pieces written in a major key would have the highest usage of the root, and the dominant of a key.

This obviously has a number flaws, but worked remarkably well for western music written between 1600 and 1900.

This is such a silly article. Of course they are technologically superior. This is like saying bare metal is better than a virtual machine. Of course.

But they are not universal for several reasons you fail to account for.

I won't bother categorically defending anything in this article, but I will leave a single statement:

good, fast, cheap - pick two.

There is no law of averages.

Do these questions have a point?

Pensions, bonuses and scholarships seem to be exceptions.

Median income is also a poor indicator.

Paid propaganda or not, I hold that these men have no teacher friends or family, or they would not have written this.

I am willing to accept that there are studies and statistics that seem to contradict what is commonly accepted. I'm also willing to accept a lot of the evidence here that the problem is not nearly as bad as believed.

This was, however, clearly written by statisticians that have no teacher friends or family. If they did, they would have asked more relevant questions of the data. For example WHY do teachers work "on average 40.6 hours during the work week, compared to 42.4 hours for private-sector professionals".

My wife is a teacher, and I can tell you exactly why.

Also, I laughed particularly hard at "teaching jobs are not particularly stressful or unpleasant compared to other occupations"

Hilarious.

oh good, I wonder if they realize developers frequently refer to GraphQL as gql.

ctrl+f for phenylephrine.

That was my first thought.

While I don't disagree with regulation of this tech, this is ridiculous take. Please stop acting like autopilot is more dangerous than all the other drivers on the road not paying attention.

If you really fear for her safety in a car, stop putting her in a car; or maybe put her in a Tesla because it's probably safer than the car you're driving.