vivin
Joined 14 years ago
Joined 14 years ago
For actual code that goes out to production, I generally figure out how I would solve the problem myself (but will use Claude to bounce ideas and approaches -- or as a search engine) and then have Claude do the boring bits.
Recently I had to migrate a rules-engine into an FSM-based engine. I already had my plan and approach. I had Claude do the boring bits while I implemented the engine myself. I find that Claude does best when you give it small, focused, incremental tasks.
I feel the same way as you in general -- I don't trust it to go and just make changes all over the codebase. I've seen it do some really dumb stuff before because it doesn't really understand the context properly.
Knowing how you would implement the solution beforehand is a huge help, because then you can just tell the LLM to do the boring/tedious bits.
So is this sort of like a local SVM classifier?
Does this worry anyone else? Or I am getting worked up over nothing?
They've based off a Ubuntu LTS, but I think they are starting to move away from that.
My website is at http://vivin.net.