vhantz

Maybe read TFA...

  > Fortunately, OpenAI has brought us one step closer to realizing Borges’s vision. Rather than generating every possible mathematical paper, they’ve found a way to probabilistically generate things that look correct.

Or at least ask your favorite LLM to read it, then give it your knee-jerk comment and ask it to check if it's already covered on the text. This saves you from wasting time using your own brain.

And still in no way warrants tens of thousands of pushes. These all overlap pretty broadly

Yeah that's all the same thing

Scaling what exactly? Anthropic doesn't release any new products except models. I'm sure you don't need tens of thousands of pushes every day to train models. Scaling fast is so far just their words, nothing else indicates it.

And how is this different than perforce?

What is all this code being used for? I'm 100% sure it's not going into their harness which has been stagnant.

Ha

Why would they? They would stand to profit since anthropic would have to take theor market share by doing the same for cheaper.

A company with (I'm guessing) less than 2500 developers need to make tens of thousands of merges every day? And they somehow had a team of 7 Claude baby sitters handle this entire thing? I use Claude everyday and I'm predicting this will turn into a major clusterfuck in not too long. Even taking into account the fact that they can burn virtually infinite tokens internally, this will not end well. If I'm wrong, I'll be glad.

  > Engineers are no less valuable, but their work is changing. All of the engineers who worked on this system would now rate Claude as better at writing code than them. But our engineers still supplied the invaluable understanding of the high-level inter-system components and the design-level tradeoffs, making informed choices around the problems we wanted to solve and the scale we knew we needed to achieve. Very often, we found that the role of the engineers was to tell Claude “no.” Agents will sometimes violate core system constraints to satisfy a pattern that should never have been allowed in the first place.

Well that's exactly what "writing" code always meant? It was never about what volume of code you can write. Better at writing code always meant better at writing good code... So how is Claude better than their engineers?

It's incredibly short-sighted to acknowledge that the baby sitters haf to tell Claude no and still not consider what subtle and nasty bugs managed to slip through. Well I guess we'll find out soon enough if that's the case. I'm betting when that's the case.

Unless you have a reasonable argument why a random AI would be trained on Microsoft's proprietary code, I don't see what you're basing any of this on. If you need the definition of clean room, go to Wikipedia.

Great ad for GLM 5.3 I have been an absolute buffoon paying for anthropic's stunted model s when I can access their same accessibility and more for cheaper. I'm switching

Is Microsoft selling the code of its proprietary products for AI trainings? Definitely news to me

Summary at the end is definitely an anti pattern too

How many token/s do you get with that setup?

It's a lot of different parts, the workflow itself is pretty straightforward. It is also all archlinux oriented because that's what I use everywhere. I'll try and clean it up over the weekend and make it available somehow. Where can I reach you once that's done?