verst
Joined 12 years ago
Joined 12 years ago
Can't Durable Entities meet the same use cases?
EDIT: Of course I am not talking about the difference in OSS vs not. Rather I'm interested in the difference in use cases and capabilities. Some of the aforementioned have ways to run things locally as well, though they are designed as distributed cloud-based PaaS services.
> our entirely in-house game engine PasVulkan, which powers SEEDS, as well as our RISC-V emulator PasRISCV, are both Free and Open Source Software (FOSS)
Can you link to PasVulkan and PasRISCV please?
That being said, just last night I observed that the identity team is now opening up agent-assisted PRs against individual service team repos to force MISE adoption and upgrade to the latest version and best practices. I think that's a great thing because many individual service teams simply lack the bandwidth or knowledge. Prior to GenAI availability I wasted many cycles on this kind of work. While GenAI made it easier - internal source documentation still does not unambiguously address every use case. So having the identity team drive this now with the help of agent sessions initiated by them is great.
Tech lead at Azure Durable Task Scheduler OSS maintainer of DAPR (Distributed Application Runtime) - a Cloud Native Compute Foundation graduated project
All comments are my personal opinions unless stated otherwise.