vasdae

There is no practical difference between the two.

Taking a pornographic movie and putting someone's face in place of one of the actor's does not violate their privacy in any way, since nothing private was shared that wasn't private before (their face).

"Nonconsensual AI porn" is a weasel term because it implies that it should be necessary to get someone's consent to create fake porn using their faces.

I agree with you in principle but there's no difference between that and what's allowed in other American platforms. Degenerate content is everywhere in all platforms.

For tiktok to be special in this regard they would have to allow something different that went way beyond what American platforms allow, and that's thus far not happening.

Tiktok has been scrutinised so much that if they were showing "brainwashing content" to Western children we would've heard about it already.

That is something for them to decide, not the state.

>Win for regulators, Win for users

That's assuming that citizens want censorship. Most of the time citizens do not have the same goals as the state's censors.

Abundance of Africans is what it is going to mean for Europe.

I work with PHP and I think WAFs are potentially useful (and potentially problematic).