vanuatu
Joined 5 months ago
Joined 5 months ago
likely they focus on something orthogonal, like trust and security, permissions, etc
fwiw i work at one of their 'top customers' and found their ai to be really useful for spinning up basically ephemeral dashboards for anyone to use (aka, i dont need to file a request to the data team and wait for someone to get back to me or go back and forth). i just ask it to do the thing.
but profitability is a very narrow view on the labs, and investors are pricing in future free cash flow
you need to take into account the derivative, what is their growth? their opex and capex? their revenue growth? their moat? New product lines and applications?
Not saying that it's a homerun, but there is a case to be made for the labs being wildly profitable in 4-10 years
The price of a given point on the intelligence frontier is only going to get cheaper, likely 10-20x over the next few years.
software is easier to build -> the world builds more software
But yes, the act of translating spec into code as a 'programmer' is gone for good.
i add more value to my company because it lets me ship much faster, debug issues faster, onboard new people faster
total enterprise ai spend is climbing https://ramp.com/data/ai-index#adoption#overall
i know multiple stealth startups with 9 figure revenues and profitable and growing
lab arr is climbing
given the recent crackdown on token spend and from speaking to execs they are very focused on the exact ROI they will get from AI
Note that business revenues in competitive markets may actually not change that much, because if everyone is using the same models there's no competitive advantage from using AI. but if one of them didn't use AI they would fall hopelessly behind
This is because data annotation platforms have very low lock in and workers jump between them opportunistically, so they want to rely on as many (small) network effects as possible
Most data annotation comes from educated Western countries atp (the $2 meme is kind of old now since the industry has moved onto RL envs) where the annotators routinely earn multiple times the local median wage.
There has already been govt arms outsourcing the agent part to a vendor and it reduced hold times significantly without reducing quality (i.e. its possible)
But each govt arm can mess it up in their own way
- establish some sort of gateway that requires authentication connected to your personal information where they can rate limit or block you
- use ai of their own to handle the volume of requests (already happening)
why would they stop reacting when money is on the table and the technology to react exists?
More agents browsing the web and people relying on AI summaries -> less revenue for Google Search and Reddit
AI drastically reducing the barrier to game dev -> less users on Roblox