valentinheun
Joined 11 years ago
Joined 11 years ago
The problem of all other standards is that they have to think about complex abstract standards.
I had a talk at the last Solid Conference. Maybe that was the event you know me from?
Imagine building becomes so easy that it is more of an "amazing" experience for you then a "geeky" long lasting frustration.
The moment real products will be in the marked that make use of the Reality Editor, you will power them up and just point your phone on them. It should not be more complicated.
The most successful webpages are those where people are authors. People want tools that empower them to engage with their environment.
To say people don't want to "rewire" their products is like saying that you don't want to connect your Electric Guitar with a wire to the Amplifier.
There is so much more that we want to implement and some of it would give answers for your situation.
I think the Reality Editor will grow incremental and every version will be a bit better then the version before. In some years, when your car actually has this functionality, your scenario will be solved.
This is something we continuously work on with the open hybrid development tools.
On the other side, the marker is limiting the visual shape of an object. The limitation do provoke new shapes as well. It has some interesting properties.
Long story short. Technology is on its way and the marker will disappear. ;-)
You can read a bit more about this problem here: http://openhybrid.org/learn%2c-setup%2c-operate.html
You can read more about it here: http://openhybrid.org/how-to-connect-everything.html
The interfaces them selfs are web pages.
If you can run nodejs in your object, you will be able to make it in to a Hybrid Object the Reality Editor can talk to.
The inspiration is the World Wide Web. It was created with a clear simple and open foundation. You can still read the first webpages ever made.
You should be able to still interact with the first Hybrid Objects ever made.