v0id_isgood

sounds fake but it's true, i am still confused till this date, but he actually didn't really do me a favour since he basically made an HN post when the language is basically not even in beta and to be honest , there's a saying "first impression is the last impression" so he just really destroyed the reputation of the project and told me to handle the gigantic crowd

cool project!

I hope you liked wyzer :)

i heard you guys and took my time to improve the project with the feedback which i really appreciate, i really don't know how to delete this HN since someone impersonated me from this account which really isn't mine. You might have expected a polished language and found a WIP programming language which i'm really sorry for, i updated the README as per the people's request and also got the documentations up on the website! :) , i'm open to more feedback and assistance to make the project better and most importantly questions! (i do have to really fix the documentation but i'd rather focus on the language first)

examples aren't updated yet some guy who mocked me earlier for the language on discord deleted his statements and walked away blocking me after giving me his hacker news credentials, now here i am answering to your questions

Ocaml was very simple to program in to be honest, and has very minimal rules as well so i can be productive with the development of the language, Rust also used ocaml in it's early versions for bootstrapping

open an issue we can discuss about it there :D

if you think so then open an issue or contribute to it :D we can discuss about it and decide which is the best option

This is hands down some of the most constructive feedback we’ve received. You hit the nail on the head.

We definitely fell into the author’s trap of structuring docs "bottom-up" (Prerequisites -> Basic Syntax -> Advanced Concepts) rather than leading with our actual core innovation: choreography.

We are restructuring the main README/docs front page right now to lead immediately with a concrete example of choreographic execution (e.g., atomic multi-node orchestration / client-server emitting) before getting into standard syntax.

Really appreciate you taking the time to dig into the docs/ dir to pull this out it’s a huge help for our presentation.

const can be used in places that need a compile-time-known value (like a fixed array size). let can't, even if it obviously holds a fixed number.

time flies :) the grass was greener before though and i miss that!

docs are under development, you can check them out soon :)

i'm actively working on the documentation without AI because it has been an awful experience with it , i've also restricted AI from contributing to it in any way except for helping the developer write their commit messages (Refer to AGENTS.md) properly which is pretty much useless anyways, the language is in it's early stages as well and things might change a lot

you did read RESEARCH.md didn't you? :)