uuidgen

It means designating a person that understands GDPR in the scope it applies to the particular data set and handles requests/security incidents. It can be secretary after a few hours of training.

And I think that if you manage a mailing list of million of people then having someone who understand security implications of it and how much they can lose (even to a simple phishing at this scale) if you get that list accessed by scammers is necessary.

So what are those problematic GDPR requirements?

- ask for permission

- do not collect more than you have

- store securely

- allow users to change or remove their data

- have a dedicated officer if you collect a lot

Is that really THAT hard? (If yes, then really you shouldn't be collecting any data.)

You can't return it "no questions asked", but if the product doesn't work you can request them to make it work or refund if they're unable to.

If they don't want there is small claims court which is cheap and simple. I have used it in cases where some manufacturers would void warranty due to "water damage" after the product stopped working. In the end they paid: cost of purchase, cost to file, cost of my legal consultation, cost of expertise showing that there was no sign of water damage. Country - Poland.

They're preventing citizens from publishing that info, not looking around and measuring from what I found.

Imagine a country that prevents its citizens from recording a song they hear and sharing it with their friends. Oh, wait, US more or less does that and forces other countries to implement policies that prevent it or they will ban trade with those countries.

C translates directly to ASM in many cases. It just makes managing offsets and other stuff easier.

C++ adds type-safety on top of that for no cost. It's great when your compiler tells you that there is no operator =|(PORTD, PINA). Did you mean |=(PORTD,PIND) or =|(PORTA,PINA).

If it works like presented on those mockups it is useless.

And since we only see mockups I'm sure it doesn't work at all and is a scam.

I've tried to make a DIY hud for bicycle riding and it failed on two steps:

- you need enough brightness for it to be visible in full daylight, so the image was be tinny or the blue oled I've tried to use weren't bright enough

- my prototype worked well with a straight piece of glass and a plastic sheet Fresnel lens, but it wasn't good for actual use. For actual use you need to project out-of-focus image on a curved surface of bike glasses. I have no idea how to make it small, precise enough and cheap enough.

There are also miniature DLP projectors from TI, that I think would work but they were pretty expensive for a hobbyist to use.

I don't think you can smell ozone - it's rather noxious. I think what you can smell as "thunderstorm" is the air cleaned a bit by ozone and the process of ionization (which traps some bigger particles).

Pakistan and India would like to disagree.

Current permission is really old, backward-compatible and simple system that works well in most situations.

setfacl exists is supported for years (although I prefer windows file permission logic to be honest)

I had 2 tricks - really high-order filter borrowed from some paper and the assumption that a walking human doesn't gain constant acceleration. Even in an elevator you stop on a floor which resets your speed to 0.

I agree that there is no way you could extend this directly for flying, but with modern devices and things like ground-distance radar, relative airspeed indicators and so on I don't think it is beyond the realm of possibility. Plus we have detailed hightmap of the world, which, when combined with a radar should allow for terrain tracking. That makes the accuracy of sole INS much less crucial.

When you crash it into the ground at plane speed?

> So if we eliminate the highly flammable gas

And replace it with a battery that has to burn out because it is impossible to extinguish?

While INS is not simple, it's also not that difficult to implement. As even the cheapest drones that can hover show new MEMS sensors are accurate enough to work with a proper filtering.

I did some prototype INS system as my master's thesis 10 years ago, the code was quick and dirty and even then the accuracy was like 30 meters after an hour of walking around with the device.