Recent submissions

Comment · 14 years ago
Passwords: Don't try to remember them. Use a service like passpack to generate and store random ones for every account. Two pass authenticate into it.

Data: Back it up. Backup your backups. Stop fucking around. If you don't get hacked, your storage will fail.

Software: Don't install shit you don't trust. Don't trust shit you can't verify.

Passwords: Don't try to remember them!!

It's 2012, not following these simple rules is inexcusable.

Comment · 14 years ago
Making everyone pay isn't a solution, it's a business plan.

When I go out to a loud club I can still communicate and no one comes around telling me it's against the club rules to try to.

The Olympics would be nothing without our ability to communicate about them. IMHO that's one of the biggest failings of NBC this year. They're doing a horrible job of communicating the Olympics. Opening up the communication channels just brings more interest, more coverage and more excitement.

Comment · 14 years ago
Yes, but you don't fix it by shutting them all down and making people pay for something they could provide themselves. You make it free, 'cos it's the Olympics and people need to communicate freely.

ps. wasn't my downvote, I think they're useless

edit-- well it seems you removed the part of your comment that called out your down-voter and now i seem pedantic

Comment · 14 years ago
Comment · 14 years ago
Comment · 14 years ago
no one uses the whois unix command?
Comment · 14 years ago
However, I'm not advocating price controls.

If what you're implying is that you believe in the ability of the free market to solve the problem, then first we would need free the wireless phone market.

Comment · 14 years ago
This isn't about cryptography, this is about what data can be pulled out of bits transfered through your computer. There is no requisite that they be encrypted, they can be obfuscated, hidden, or just not recognizable as illegal to you. There is no way for you to verify that a collection of bits, put on your computer by a 3rd party, does not in fact represent something illegal. You would have to have access to every existing and theoretical encoding, encryption and obfuscation technique, and use them in every theoretical combination to verify such a thing.
Comment · 14 years ago
It's not about what kind of software they are considered, it's about code running on your system. In the RMS eyes, if code runs on your system, and you can't read/modify that code yourself, it's unethical.
Comment · 14 years ago
The problem is thinking that there is a way. You can't. Data can easily be obfuscated. As long as bits are flowing through your machine from sources that you don't control, you could be middle man to anything.
Comment · 14 years ago
...everyone knows child porn is bad. It's existence though, does not negate the usefulness of a system. Not that cryptosphere is going to be the open government revolution, but your comment is a useless vomit of emotional blather.
Comment · 14 years ago
The first one with the 2-tone metal back is still the prettiest IMHO. And it seemed the sturdiest. A drop resulted in a dent, not a crack or finger shaving glass shards.
Comment · 14 years ago
Because unfortunately logical reasoning and argument construction are not educational targets for most people. :(
Comment · 14 years ago
Haven't made any commits in a while. Waiting for more features from meteor.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton