uVacCXNiiJCTnYB
Joined 5 years ago
Joined 5 years ago
Other than that, most of my open source work was just created by myself. If there's something you think could be useful or interesting, just make it and open source it.
But it seems unlikely for me that anyone in general tech would know much about the science industry or positions of "research engineer" without having prior exposure to that industry somehow.
Like, I could spend 2 more decades doing full stack dev, it would change nothing to the kind of jobs available to me. I'm already as high as I can go in this area without going into management (which I have no interest in)
The engine I'm making is for a very specific need (initially made to help someone else make a specific game), a few people have been using it to make their games, but it's a pretty niche thing for narrative games - https://get-narrat.com/
I'm making it for fun, but I don't expect something like that to ever make money, for that I'd need some big companies to decide to sponsor it and pay me, which is super unlikely.
Not everyone has to be an "entrepreneur". I like making things, not running companies and managing people/talking to investors and all the other things that come with trying to create a startup.
And yes, sorry but if you're not aware, some people have life situations that don't allow them to simply quit their job and start a company without a safety net. There's a reason the vast majority of "entrepreneurs" are of a very specific demographic
It's really hard getting out of the boxes we're typecast in.
I still like programming a lot when I do it on interesting things (which are side projects really), but I haven't had interesting programming at my job in years.
It's a good way to make yourself hard to replace, but they're probably gonna want you to keep doing the thing you're hard to replace at.
On the other hand I've found those companies hard to break into because they often expect you to have specific expertise in things like "very high scale applications" or specific low-level things.
I only tried Gitlab I think, and never really heard back.
FAANG might be interesting but their interview processes kill it for me. I have no idea how people find the time to do homework for it + are willing to spend months in this lengthy interview pipeline.
(Also there are problems with FAANG type companies being generally kind of evil these days, of course)
Maybe eventually it could get to the point where I could do part time freelancing supplemented with github sponsor income, but even that would take a long time.
I suspect outside of a few super-popular repo managers, github sponsorship doesn't bring much income (don't know if there's any public data on that)