Recent submissions

Comment · 4 years ago
Rad! Thanks!
Comment · 4 years ago
This is kinda what I was hoping there would be - some secret trick haha :)
Comment · 4 years ago
Great tip! Thanks :)
Comment · 4 years ago
Thank you!
Comment · 5 years ago
Legitimate question: why do people find this interesting and/or why is it relevant to the trial?
Comment · 5 years ago
This reminds me of a Douglas Adams quote - although he was talking about technology, it seems appropriate here also :)

“I've come up with a set of rules that describe our reactions to technologies: 1. Anything that is in the world when you’re born is normal and ordinary and is just a natural part of the way the world works. 2. Anything that's invented between when you’re fifteen and thirty-five is new and exciting and revolutionary and you can probably get a career in it. 3. Anything invented after you're thirty-five is against the natural order of things.”

― Douglas Adams, The Salmon of Doubt

Comment · 5 years ago
Dystopian maybe, but think of the great ROI.
Comment · 5 years ago
well... when they start doing all their flights on electric engines in 2022 I guess we'll see if it makes sense... did you read my link?
Comment · 5 years ago
Comment · 5 years ago
why else would it exist? :)
Comment · 5 years ago
As others have said, our entire way of thinking is predicated on lack. Or, as it was said by The Watchowski Sisters in The Matrix:

> Did you know that the first Matrix was designed to be a perfect human world? Where none suffered, where everyone would be happy. It was a disaster. No one would accept the program. Entire crops were lost. Some believed we lacked the programming language to describe your perfect world. But I believe that, as a species, human beings define their reality through suffering and misery. The perfect world was a dream that your primitive cerebrum kept trying to wake up from. Which is why the Matrix was redesigned to this: the peak of your civilization.

Comment · 5 years ago
Comment · 5 years ago
Agreed, this post completely misses how the power dynamics of wealth affect the opinions and 'rationality' of players. It also never mentions how a whole section of society would be unable to take part in this system due to their socioeconomic status.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton