txzl

I can read originals too. And I did. And I think I liked Chekhov at some point in my life. But now seeing what people who grew up on this literature are up to, what their morals really sums up to leaves me no desire to ever touch it again

I just asked Fable 5 max to create a 2d game about caterpillar climbing a tree and eating fruits. The game looks good - animations, 8-bit aesthetics, procedural tree branching, but the tree's branches are dead ends. You can't go back once you started climbing a branch. Yes, LLM doesn't have a reliable way to test it's game yet. All the screenshots, and playwright tests will never be enough to test even a simple game. But can we call a machine doing such mistakes a general intelligence? It has no embodied intelligence. No way to experience time the way we do. All it has is text. Yes, they can have images, sound too, but no big models (at least those we are supposed to use for coding) currently are native with video as far as I am concerned. And I am not sure that just video without embodied experience is enough to understand the world the way humans do. Of course we can get incredible results from machines that have a very different experience of the world than we do. But is this a general intelligence? I guess "general" is supposed to mean being able to do everything any human can do (minus the skills requiring a body)?

Any examples of nations that succeeded in this regard? (currently corruption-free states)

I think much more lines should go to Moscow. At least from such places as Crimea. But I see you covered only western/euro-american institutions.

same. but, mostly no recall lately. as I go to bed at 2:00 and sleep 6 hours max

it's written by LLM