Recent submissions

Comment · 8 months ago
Thanks!

Its all bambi legs at the moment.. I wonder if we'll ever get past this stage. Moving it all to a 'real' product is an option before it gets too serious. I'll bring this up with the group and lets see what happens.

Comment · 8 months ago
How did I not know about this until now!

We've spent over a year creating a delivery platform based on ArgoCD that bundles a git server and a registry (for air-gapped clients) so that we can deliver our products into various customer environments. This pretty much does it all, but with bells and whistles on top! Nice!

Curious why the pricing page doesn't seem to allow Euros and yet its an option?

Comment · 1 year ago
Yes, of course.. I'm actually in the process of replacing nodes. The original 3x Ryzen5 4-core 32Gb hosts are being replaced by Ryzen9 12-core 96Gb hosts.. its just taking a bit of time. As long as I only ever take one down for updates at a time, its no bother for a home-lab environment.
Comment · 1 year ago
Comment · 2 years ago
Comment · 2 years ago
I once (March 2014) emailed hashicorp to retrieve a lost vagrant licence key. I got a direct reply from you Mitchell with instructions on what to do. Blew my tiny mind, those were rare bygone days in our industry.

Thank you for all you've created.

Comment · 3 years ago
Comment · 4 years ago
Comment · 4 years ago
Comment · 7 years ago
Comment · 7 years ago
Comment · 8 years ago
Well, that (IP address and specific ID) probably constitutes information from which the identity of a natural living person can be discerned and therefore does fall under the protections of GDPR.

However, that by itself doesn't mean you can't collect it, just that you need to have specifically asked for their informed consent and not hidden this purpose away in a changelog.

Comment · 8 years ago
ah.. of course, yes.

I was just responding to the specific language in the parent post that seemed to convey that the author of the article knew about the disability and 'decided' to have the child regardless of this 'fact'.

Of course, there are some wonderful wonderful people in this world who find themselves being adopted by equals.

Comment · 8 years ago
The child in this article is 15, so in 2003 did we have the sophisticated tests available that are as easily applied?

Additionally, whilst testing has become better, it won't catch everything unless we look for it specifically. There are mosaic mutations that are incredibly difficult to spot and many other chromosome conditions that we are only now able to define because of our more capable tests (http://www.rarechromo.org/disorder-guides).

Finally, no one 'decides' to have a disabled child. I don't know what you actually meant to convey by your comment. Perhaps a judgement on the impossible decisions parents of children with disabilities wrestle with, perhaps a dismissal of all people with disabilities because testing means they shouldn't exist.. I can't quite understand it.

Comment · 10 years ago
Whilst at first glance this doesn't look altogether fair, I can understand why its been done.

The government should not be able to use the tools of state to suppress legitimate parliamentary opposition. There would be nothing to stop the party in power using the law to specifically target opposing parties.

For the rest of us here in the UK, your traffic is already being collated and probably has been for some time.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton