tsycho
Joined 16 years ago
Joined 16 years ago
Maybe a few pros have been playing for 20+ years, but most of the top players (by championship wins) are young.
Hera, Lierrey, Vinchester, Lewis...are in their 20s. And even the previous #1 Viper isn't that old.
- Only ship products when they are perfect against every possible edge condition?
or
- If Waymo fails in a few scenarios today after 20 years of effort, they can never succeed?
And weren't the layoffs of 2023-24 supposed to correct that?
In my experience, in every big tech company for the past two decades, almost everyone always complained that they were understaffed to meet their goals/okrs.
IMO, the real explanation is:
- Some unprofitable companies don't want to raise money in a high interest rate world, and are using AI as a partial excuse, partial ambition to do layoffs to cut costs. Eg: NET
- Other companies are investing heavily into data centers (eg: META) and need to cut costs elsewhere to offset that.
And in both cases, there's some real productivity gains that they have already seen due to AI that will offset, plus they expect to see more gains as the remaining people will work harder and be more motivated to increase their productivity for job security.
And yet, less than 0.01% of the population (made up number, but I am more likely to be overestimating than underestimating) do so.
Running local models to do real work is likely to be another niche hobby.
The funny thing is that a lot of Google's internal training content uses an imaginary product "gShoe", and discusses the privacy implications of data that such a shoe might collect :D
And since iPhones form the largest single company's device network in the rich countries, that is a pretty big advantage.
If taking a bus becomes easy, reliable and fast, more people will do it, and there will be less cars on the road.
That said, having worked on account/identity systems at another FAANG, I think that the commenters saying that Apple is holding this back purely to sell more iPads are underestimating the complexity of this feature.
This is not a feature that you just bolt on to the top. It will require a significant ground up rewrite of iOS' fundamentals if you want to support account switching without a full shut down of the device (and even with that, there are complications with shared storage).
There are likely tons of singletons across the iOS codebase for the "current account", and switching between users will easily lead to bugs where the new account shares/accesses state from the previous account.....and these "violations" are much harder to detect via static analysis than you might naively imagine.
UPDATE: I wasn't aware that Apple already supported a bunch of this via MDM. My only point was that if they didn't already build this into the foundational layer of the OS, then this is a very difficult feature to add later. If they already have this, then I don't have any defense left for them.
The r/aoe2 community is also generally welcoming and helpful.
I presume the original videos of Feynman are lost, or never existed?
There is an inherent level of complexity in projects that solve some real world problem, due to all the code handling edge cases that were added incrementally over time.
Isn't that what they are kinda doing? 13bn out of the 16bn is coming from Google itself.
I think the reason they are taking 3bn from outside high-profile investors is to validate the valuation, for legal or accounting reasons.
I use Kokoro 82M and it's good overall, but it does make mistakes on some common phrases, and it's not real time fast (runs at about 6-7X content-to-encoding time ratio on my home server)