trickyager

This is silly pedantry. Musk can have many fans and be one of the most hated people at the same time. Please touch some grass.

Venezuelan oil is very heavy, but the US oil industry is literally designed to process this type. The US exports their sweet crude elsewhere because they can't process it.

I'm not sure if this matters. The illegality of the article's central premise seems like an important point excluded from the article.

Can you please explain how this could be excessive, or provide a wiki page that shows an excessive or confusing change?

This is a false equivalence. We as a society generally accept that people can change their name, and as a matter of common decency take steps to use that name in the future.

This has nothing to do with how encyclopedias present fringe scientific ideas.

I have good news for you afpx! We don't have to pick either of those options in the real world. This is all the more telling for the folks who have chosen fascism despite not needing to.

This isn't weird, really. Rational people tend to not like being associated with fascists, and with Elon at the helm Tesla is strongly associated with American Fascism at the moment.

Oooh. An appeal to a hypothetical consensus to justify transphobic opinions. Absolutely fascinating to see modern fascism at play.

I'm extremely puzzled why you're bringing transgender people into this. You could've said "an opera in Columbia" and have had an equally valid argument about fiscal responsibilty and America's meddling in other countries. You, however, felt that it was morally necessary to mention that this was to benefit transgender people trying to live their lives as if that's a unique negative to be avoided.

How _very_ interesting.

Are they, though? I'm not trying to be flippant. Rather, it's entirely unclear to me any positive outcome for these individuals or American citizen in general as a result of this effort. Can you provide vetted sources that accurately communciate actual benefits as a result of this effory for anyone other than Elon Musk and Donald Trump as individuals?

I agree with you 100%, and we may both be correct!

A brief list of features withheld or removed from Core:

- The dbt docs functionality is no longer maintained in favor of dbt Explorer in dbt cloud. A natural consequence is that larger dbt Core projects simply cannot leverage local docs due to performance defects.

- Multi-project support was widely discussed in the core repo w/ tooling contributions from the community, but that was locked behind enterprise-tier dbt cloud accounts

- Metricflow was a full OSS application that used to work in tandem with dbt Core. Post-acquisition, the original code was re-licensed and the functionality added to Cloud only (and you have to pay per semantic layer query now).