trialect
Joined 3 years ago
Joined 3 years ago
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/8030
then it just looks like a bad joke with all the anime girls and everything else...
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.earslap.to...
I will never migrate my account to microsoft. I hate them with a passion.
Back when google tried to force everyone with a youtube account to singup to that +1 account (what was it? google plus or something?). I never did that. I was not able to reply to any comments on my videos for a years!
Then suddenly I noticed I can comment/reply again. They just silently removed their forced account migration procedure.
microsoft will do the same or they will go to hell for sure.
90% of my feed since yesterday contains the word SVB from hackernews.
Is this some kind of US thing? Can we just move on to other things?
What's more is podman especially is about running software on different distros easily.
What I'm expecting from RH is make software (if that is free and opensource and about running other software without the hassle of packaging, etc.) that can be - sort of easily - used on other distros too. But just to be clear, this expectation is not only towards RH.. it is towards any other linux distros. In this special case it is RH indeed.
The whole idea behind podman is great (especially not having to have a root daemon to run containers), but if they want it to succeed they need a proper and easy way for other linux distro users to use it.
and yes, they also said in https://github.com/containers/podman/discussions/13097#discu...: "if I want to get Real Wise. Only Supported Podman comes from Red Hat Enteprise Linux and perhaps SUSE. (Maybe Oracle Linux)"
> Doesn't it follow then that the responsibility for making Podman available on Ubuntu falls on either Canonical or volunteers that use Ubuntu, and not Red Hat?
As mentioned in https://github.com/containers/podman/discussions/13097, node.js is just an example, but they could do it. Why wouldn't redhat do it with podman?
> Otherwise, you could blame any developer on any software for not making their code available on any distro, and perhaps even any OS.
Yes you could. And in certain cases - like this one - you should too.
(oh, and also you mean that is a community package - meaning unsupported)
Also the Kubic repo is old.
I don't know what makedeb is, but of course anyone can make .deb packaging for anything, but that does not mean it is supported in any way (not to mention if a package has several other package dependecies, and those also have to be packaged carefully)
Also see: https://github.com/containers/podman/discussions/17362 https://github.com/containers/podman/issues/14065 https://github.com/containers/podman/discussions/13097
RH being RH only RH (and derivatives) supports latest podman. For example on ubuntu lts you cannot run podman 4.4 and you will never have the possibility to run it. Maybe in 5 years Ubuntu/Debian repos will be updated to contain podman 4.4, but until then you are stuck with whatever version your distro has.