trentmb

> "It lets everyone know it's safe to ignore you" is a personal attack.

No, it's a general attack on anyone that cites horseshit.

I "attacked" pop econ bullshit, not a person.

Thank you for the last bit about Freakonomics- it lets everyone know it's safe to ignore you.

No, no one above "director" is doing shit, if that.

The customers are paying for it, if only in future higher prices.

Wipe that polish off your face before speaking bootlicker.

> They're flying

Grunts are, the executive staff, directors, and share holders ain't doin' shit.

If any profit goes to the employees, I'm on board.

> 2,3,4) A judge could reasonably find that you were attempting to circumvent the law and declare all of these as “bot”.

Unless you were disabled and using assistive technology.

Add 2018 to the title please.

> Yes, but why Jefferson

Because they thought Jeffersons thoughts on the matter were relevant.

> Why not Arglebargle?

Because I know what that word means.

> Or me?

Because "lisper central banks" doesn't produce any meaningful results in a search engine.

> I have musings on the topic of central banks, would you like to hear them?

Sure.

No- they just told you to read Jeffersons musings on the topic of central banks.

> Also, Radvocate, wondering if you can address the PII concerns other's have raised, as that is a very big deal.

For credit cards at least, you aren't giving any more information to them than you would any random website where you make a purchase.

Less, even, as there's no expiration date or CVV.

I hold PoA for my father- what's the best way, using this form, to say they're his accounts, but I'm the one filing the letter on his behalf?