travisp
Joined 17 years ago
Joined 17 years ago
Everyone should probably have their blood level of vitamin d tested. Most people are not going to see dramatic changes to health from vitamin d supplementation.
Part of the problem of all the observational trials looking at vitamin d is that low vitamin d is a biomarker for being less healthy. People who are ill spend less time outdoors. People who spend more time outdoors are already healthier and are also getting other benefits from their outdoor activities.
You can try to control for all of these things, but every time we actually try to test what happens if you give people Vitamin D, we find almost no benefit.
So I would certainly expect some sort of difference in patient population. It would suggest those initiated on hydroxychloroquine would normally have less severe rheumatoid arthritis (or have some other difference that their doctor would choose to not use methotrexate by default), although I don’t know if that’s the case in reality.
Everyone commenting on this post is acting immediately as if this report is 100% true, but the reality is that we know very little about the report.
A reasonable look at this particular claim and the history of similar types of claims: https://twitter.com/pwnallthethings/status/13965771532323799...
However, the evidence is pretty clear that this was found and published earlier. It was originally described as "BtCoV/4991" and it was described and published as far as I can find as far back as 2016. (The name was changed to RaTG13 to describe that it was collected in 2013 in Tongguan).
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/983856042 <-- partial RaTG13 sequence in 2016
Source: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2021/04/22/science/flu-s...
My wife is also an ER doctor and agrees that there were times that they didn't perform many/any flu tests--mostly in the spring of 2020 and after none of the flu tests were returning positive for a while. But this past winter people have definitely been tested for the flu. Rapid influenza tests are also usually performed first, only sending to labs when confirmatory testing is desired.
(although some states have more strict health privacy laws)
> In fact, physicians represent about 15% - 16% of the top 1% of income earners in the US.
This may be accurate, I'm unsure, but it wouldn't change that if US doctors were paid the same as their European counterparts, it would not make a truly significant change in overall US medical spending (this would even be true if doctors did actually make up 20% of medical expenditures, like you assert earlier).
blog: http://travispew.com
You can reach me on Twitter at @travispew or by emailing me at travis@ my blog's domain above. And now also on mastodon at https://mastodon.social/@travispew