trapper
Joined 18 years ago
Joined 18 years ago
In private, they share in confidence with people they trust and organizations that they work with who treat such knowledge as competitive advantage.
The thing is, once you are at the top of your field, what incentive is there to share if you are still making personal breakthroughs on a regular basis? I don't see any.
If you haven't experienced sport (or similar) at the highest levels you probably won't get how much a few insane minutes can enhance your mastery. It really is a whole new level, where everyone is competing at their peak and you have to greatly improve your level or fail miserably.
This type of pressure & competitiveness just doesn't happen in most business environments, so the degree of pressure to lift your game isn't there.
There are many ways. Off the top of my head:
- to focus on speed of development you could use a practice or warm-up
> provide each with a practice in another language
> provide a sample solution in pseudocode in both functional and imperative style
- To focus on speed of problem solving you could use topcoder data + research of participants programming language backgrounds.
The important thing is that if the effect is large it's easy to spot. According to some, the difference is an order of magnitude. If that's true, it will be trivial to spot.
http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1016762
What's wrong with that as evidence for lisps superiority?