tppiotrowski

Joined 7 years ago

Karma
3,256
Submissions
805
Member since
May 11
Show HN: https://shademap.app

Twitter: @shademap

Writing: https://tedpiotrowski.svbtle.com

Contact: [hn_username]@gmail.com

View on Hacker News

Recent submissions

Comment · 1 month ago
I remember the same in Tiblisi, Georgia!
Comment · 2 months ago
Syabru Besi is downriver of the border and the starting point for the Langtang valley trek which is probably the third most popular trekking location in Nepal (behind Everest basecamp and Annapurna circuit). I think the tourist data they have is from tourists that are traveling with guides but from my experience many tourists also bypass the official requirements and trek solo so the number could be much higher if the Langtang is affected.
Comment · 2 months ago
The cloud effect is really nice!
Comment · 2 months ago
Building data comes from OvertureMaps data which is a superset of OSM. I update the building data set each month so if you make changes in OSM they should show up on ShadeMap at latest 30 days later.
Comment · 2 months ago
Nice. I'm really proud of how fast the annual sunlight calculation is for a location but it def needs better UX.
Comment · 2 months ago
"Top of canopy" - view from above like looking down from an airplane window. You won't see any shadows looking down on a forest because you only see sunlight landing on the top of the canopy. Most accurate.

"Below canopy" - what shadows would look like on the ground. If you're in a dense forest everything is in shadow because the trees obscure the sun. I guesstimate how big and where the below canopy shadows land. Any vegetation that's more than 2 meters tall, I place a shaded area beneath it. Not super accurate because it treats trees like cylinders instead of a sphere/triangle on top of a cylinder.

"No trees" - only building and terrain shadows are shown on the map.

Comment · 2 months ago
Comment · 2 months ago
Agreed. From current data it's not possible to know the type of tree, only their locations so the model is simplified.
Comment · 2 months ago
Sorry about that. The current tree estimate is done via computer vision but I am working on migrating to LiDAR backed data which should eliminate false positives.

Just waiting for the TBs and TBs of data to download and then this Macbook M4 is going to make some heat...

Comment · 2 months ago
Thanks for the reply. Do you have a tree or bush outside your window? I estimate where tree shadows fall but it's not super accurate. In the settings dialog you can toggle, "below canopy", "above canopy" or disable tree shadows altogether.
Comment · 2 months ago
Site maintainer here. There is a polygon drawing tool in the upper right corner of the map. You can use it to draw polygons on the map and assign them a height. The shadows will update instantly. You can use it to add buildings that are missing from the map, simulate a tree placement or even simulate cutting down a tree if you set the height to 0.
Comment · 2 months ago
Website creator/maintainer here. Happy to try and diagnose the error if you elaborate on what the discrepancy is (tree, building, hill, etc)...
Comment · 2 months ago
Not specifically for eclipses but has been useful in finding places where the sun will be visible during the current eclipse since the eclipse will occur when the sun is quite low on the horizon.
Comment · 5 months ago
Happy to field any questions about the project.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton