tokenizer
Joined 14 years ago
Joined 14 years ago
An example being pederasty of little boys in Afghanistan being common, similar to your example. Completely cultural and I would argue traumatic.
Not for men (for the most part, as in 99%). They either love vagina, and are disgusted by penis, or vice versa.
On the other side, most "straight" women, fantasize and experiment with the same sex, and to them, preference is usually on a sliding scale.
That all said, sexual preference is further confusing when we have a large subset of straight males, being attracted to very feminine transsexuals, like Bailey Jay.
To me this means male sexual preference is holistic, meaning if you pass as a woman, but have a penis, you may attract many straight males, who would gag at the idea of a well toned and very masculine male.
Even if the masculine "man" was a woman passing as one, with a vagina.
I'm not too familiar with analytics and marketing, but I did like how the contribution and web store mechanics were set up.
That all said, I'm curious how much revenue you can attribute to optimization versus just general interest when it came to people wanting to donate, or buy a MAGA hat.
What I mean is, how much money could have been generated, without utilizing optimization tools such as the ones you used from Adobe, and by adding "Official" to everything.
Not trying to demoralize them, I'm just curious if they could separate that revenue, and point to a portion of it that directly came from optimization.
Ideally any word should be able to be copyrighted or whatever.
But if you want to ban words based on something, like racism or whatever. Don't be surprised when someone's sensibilities outpace yours.
Beyond that, the pros and experts who have a lot do cold storage. Putting the keys offline.
> He is candid enough to admit he tested the method on his production staff after "reading about the trend on Facebook" and musing on whether it could be an innovative draw for future talent.
> But the firm's experiment was ditched in less than a month, after bad feedback from employees.
We already have short work weeks. It's called part time. If you don't like the pay, blame reality. This experiment was done with tax money, and my guess is businesses would not voluntarily pay more for less work, without massive subsidy, which would be pro large corporation, and anti small business.
I welcome anyone, including Elon Musk, to attempt it. Barring anyone is an affront to human progress.
Doubt it, at least not in the next 8-12 years. Let's wait and see what President Trump does with Healthcare and the Economy.
If he messes up, Dems should be able to get everything back in no time.
> And, in the interest of supporting a united front between liberals and socialists
As a classical liberal, I find communists (anarcho-communists?) writing stuff like this (https://twitter.com/nunzioni/status/827041257323126784 / https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C3otTkPVMAEBiEb.jpg) extremely concerning.
Honestly, this sounds very Pro American Corporations, and very anti-other countries.
No one ever mentions Brain Drain - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_capital_flight
It's a disservice to young and struggling Americans, and young and struggling youth in other countries, by making it harder for youth here to find jobs, and robbing other nations and cultures of their best.
> The tech industry is a global one, and it depends on hiring workers and employees from around the world.
So there's no need for immigration for tech. Remote working, new start ups in other nations.
I see no problem with restructuring our immigration patterns, especially if it helps young Americans already here gets jobs more easily, and enriches other nations and peoples, so they don't have to "move to the US" for a future. My ideal world has people working in their own countries, for their own families and culture, not for the established corporations of the West.
Now it's the progressive left against everyone else, calling them nazis, fascists, and alt right. This ostracizes the center so good luck with that...