tito
Joined 16 years ago
Joined 16 years ago
And full report: https://wedocs.unep.org/rest/api/core/bitstreams/8819b586-8d...
I recommend putting the full report in your favorite LLM and asking questions as a start!
From what I can see the only thing that durably keeps me on iOS at this point is Facetime.
(Siri AI is bad. Lots of "Did you mean". I'm back on Siri Classic now.)
Zeke's multi-year comparison chart (#1) ends in December, but the forecast chart does show through July 2027 all the different models. I don't see any modeling a double peak, though that NASA-GEOS-S2S-2 line peaks in February.
25 years of data, any other impacts you've seen from carbon dioxide rising? (~370 ppm in 2001 to 420 ppm this year)
But this mental model loses the most important feature of the climate system.
It's not a dimmer switch. It's more like an ON / OFF switch.
We live in a stable climate today. Things are getting a little warmer. And we see some weird things. But still, even at a little warmer, we are in the same stable climate system, just a little warmer or cooler.
However, if we flip to "OFF" on a stable climate by getting a lot warmer, our climate system moves to a chaotic state unlike anything we've ever known in human history.
You can find Frontier's portfolio here: https://frontierclimate.com/portfolio
And their perspectives on their process here: https://frontierclimate.com/pathway
Let's say I take it that whatever post you're referencing is slimy, built on disaster capitalism, and downright bad. And your being jaded is totally understandable.
To that I remind you: "All that is necessary for evil to succeed is for good people to do nothing"
What could you do to do drive the world in a different direction? (see my other posts for projects if you want help out with our El Niño Ready dashboard)
You can find examples here on Frontier's site of companies that are taking biomass (plant stuff like tree waste) and sequestering it in mines or other storage deep underground.
When thinking about sucking carbon from the sky, I find it useful to separate how I think about grabbing on to carbon dioxide from how to store carbon dioxide, rather than thinking of it as one step. I find it's easy to get lost and either over or undervalue things otherwise.
Plants and trees are excellent at grabbing on, for example, and with a good process they can lead to very cheap methods to store/remove carbon dioxide for a thousand years.
Marine carbon removal: 16
Biomass carbon removal & storage: 13
Direct air capture: 12
Field weathering: 8
Mineralization: 8
And, at the same time, polluting the climate makes the climate system far more susceptible to flipping to a chaotic system unknown to humanity.
As Stewart Brand says, "We are as gods and might as well get good at it."
Not sure why folks downvoted you.
Reversing climate change. Carbon removal, direct air capture, biochar, rock weathering, planetary cooling, sun reflection, the works.
I'm the co-founder of AirMiners (http://airminers.com): the place for scientists, entrepreneurs, and engineers mining carbon from the air.
227 startup graduates from our accelerator have raised $250M of venture capital and grants, and sold more than $100M of carbon removal credits.
My talk on carbon removal here: https://www.ted.com/talks/tito_jankowski_take_carbon_out_of_the_air_and_make_useful_things_with_it
New to carbon removal? Check out the AirMiners Boot Up http://bootup.airminers.com
We also launched a new course in collaboration with Nasdaq: https://www.nasdaq.com/carbon-academy
Join my weekly carbon removal newsletter: http://airminers.com/newsletter