tiglionabbit

Yeah but can we go there?

Quite right. It seems Christians are more threatened by Muslims than they are by Atheists, despite them both being abrahamic religions.

Why make people into atheists?

Don't you want to live in a world where people make decisions based on observable things, rather than blind faith in arbitrary nonsense?

You can't reason with a religious person. Their axioms can be completely incompatible if, for example, they believe the afterlife is more important than actual life.

Then cache the dependencies you're using.

"Wants to work with" doesn't apply here. This is what the phone does by default, so it's not a conscious choice of the user. Also, if the college had written the `accepts` field on their form correctly it would have been converted to JPG automatically when they uploaded it.

Huh. So, according to the other comments, if they'd set the `accepts` on their form to MIME types instead of extensions, the browser would have converted the file to a JPG automatically.

Thanks!

And no one would want them because they're a few years out of date.

Then we should all start our own business, right?

Definitely right. Sometimes I look at notes I made for myself, telling myself what to do, and then ultimately rebel against my past self because I don't want to do what I'm telling myself to do.

Systems are better when they're an augmentation of your memory that you can appreciate. For example, I always put events in my google calendar so I can remember when they are and catch overlaps early.

I've had a bad relationship with todo lists. They get stale really quickly. If I look at a todo list that's a few days old, I might think, "Why should I do that now? Why should I factor the work in this way? Just so I can say I'm done with this item?" In practice, the way I factor a task changes constantly. So now the way I do todo lists is more like an aid to my memory. When I have time to do stuff (which is rare) I'll write down the things that are most important at that exact moment. Sometimes I'll skim through todo lists from previous days to jog my memory, but I won't copy over everything. I'll arrange the things into an itinerary for the day and see how many of them I can get done. Usually it's not all of them. And that's OK.

The additive/subtractive colors thing is has a really neat sort of symmetry to it. That's how I knew it was the correct explanation. There was no such beautiful internal logic to the Red Blue Yellow system and I couldn't figure out how people came up with it.

I never believed my teachers. As early as 4th grade they were treating me like a troublemaker for not following rules like their three-paragraph essay format.

I don't like the idea of having authorities on knowledge. I much prefer Montessori or Socratic teaching methods, or explorations. They're harder to do, but they produce a better understanding of the material and they allow the student to teach the teacher as well.

I remember this one distinctly because in school they just gave me a handout and asked me to come up with the explanation myself. I thought about it. I didn't know. It seemed like if you had an angle of attack then the air would hit against the bottom -- like a knife would want to continue to travel straight through a fluid. I didn't know what the significance of the curve over the top of the wing was. They tried to guide me toward the equal-transit-time explanation and I was like, uh, ok, is that really true? I remained suspicious of this for a long time.

What sort of alternative primaries? Just slightly-adjusted colors that still trigger each of the three cones individually?