throwawei369

If am not wrong, Little snitch doesn't stop any malicious domain that the user is not aware of.

Little snitch is effectively a MITM app for all connections on the system it is installed on.

My point is. With Linux and FOSS software, you do not necessarily need to treat programs as hostile. By default, most software is open and can be audited. If you decide to extensively use proprietary software then you have bigger problems that even Little Snitch cannot solve.

There are better alternative routes you can take that do not involve a "MITM" for all your connections.

> You can apply more flexible rules than just blocking specific hostnames -- for example, based on IP subnets, port numbers, or specific binary executables

This doesn't sound like a common use case. You can already block connection on a specific port with all available firewall programs. And you can bubblewrap binaries from making internet connections.

> You can block connections even from programs that bypass the default system-wide DNS configuration

Other than browser's making use of DOH for DNS, I can't think of a common use case for this. Besides, why would I want to Wireshark my browser? Why not use uBlock to filter domains.

Doesn't seem obvious to me why one would go through all this trouble.

So Wireshark but with connection permission toggles... Why does anyone need this on Linux? You can already block domains you know are malicious in the hosts file or use a personalized DNS resolver for that. Or am I missing something?

This would all be true if podman wasn't a gimped version of docker.

How about you consume your international news from outlets that actually specialize on reporting global news. Such as the BBC world service.

Not in support of the above poster's views btw, but I think he gave the analogy in a broader sense. Your take on this mirror analogy is from a micro-level. I still think looking at FB from a birds-eye view, the society mirror assessment is fairly accurate.

Reminds me of a situation where I had to do tech support for a pal who had bought a Chinese phone (later learned it was a Xiaomi device). Turns out for some reason the Chinese model didn't have Google play store pre-installed since it is useless in their home market. However to get around this restriction, you had to locate one of the system apps, then search for a specific app inside it that would then install the Google play store.

Also, unrelated but obligatory. Huawei after the Trump ban now offers a de-googled smartphone experience.

Last I checked it's not illegal to be a fascist. Hacking computer systems and stealing data however is illegal. Whether this is right or wrong is debatable. Free speech shouldn't be.

This increase of extreme assault on free-speech platforms should be worrying to everyone. Not too long ago, we were hailing the "internet" as a free fair space. Now it is a free fair space ... for everyone but some kind of people.

I'm for free speech but this specific kind of targeted attacks is getting out of hand.

I can tell your age by this comment. I'll leave you with this quote.

"You either die a hero, or you live long enough to see yourself become the villain"

Instead Firefox uploads your geographical location to their servers every time it starts up. And before you ask, this telemetry cannot be stopped.

And when you finally manage to do some therapeutic dissonance from the above default behaviour.

Whenever you use the inbuilt DoH on Firefox, FF shares this stats with Cloudflare too.

> data.mistat.intl.xiaomi.com

Ah. I'd recognize this spy domain anywhere since it regularly features in my pihole's top 5 blacklisted ones