throwawaysleep

Both my employers do, but it is not genuinely getting human reviewed anyway. I frequently let my Claude approve PRs that I have not even read the title of.

Society is pretty tolerant about this though?

You can have both, but there are very few people who care about it purely as a craft. They want pay, recognition, etc along with it.

No, your neighbours decided that all corporate malfeasance was approved if it gets them a cheaper egg.

Isn't the goal then demand destruction?

Do people generally take good care of their health? I do not think so. So if they will not care about even the present, why would making them return make them care about the future?

Any business where people are looking at a screen should probably sell ads.

> The profitability of being able to serve a query wasn't really under question (nor is the margin expected to be anything less than 80%+) I think.

HN had long debates about whether AI inference could even be affordable from a compute perspective.

It wouldn't change a thing.

People have to live in their bodies. Do they care for them? No.

People aren't treating it as a thoughtful contribution. It is more of a flag, like "spam".

> And if you do that, you’ll sometimes assign praise and blame to them, instead of hoarding it all to yourself.

I mean, if things are going well, the logical thing to do is to hoard it.

The problem with applying Hanlon's Razor here is that it presumes malice is rare. The current administration revels in malice. They very openly decide things based on malice.

Painters with broad strokes have done extremely well the past few decades.

Americans are such unserious people.

But it is currently a strong mitigating factor. The law is full of oopsie defenses.