throwawaybbq1

Does this mean a huge hiring uptick in the US/layoff reversal? I do think this law caused some of the bad market. Will undoing it get us back to where we were?

Can you clarify this? You saying non H1B's would not pay the crazy high rents of SV's housing?

Curious where you sourced the parts? In Canada, shipping kills it for me. When I priced out the robot + electronics + $100 in shipping, I am around $700 - far cry from the $100 on the "sticker".

My taste buds have become extremely muted after covid bouts and other sinus issues. Wonder if this would be helpful.

In the US? I don't think what you are saying is supported by real data. My understanding is that US works did see an improvement in incomes in the last decade but Canadian workers did not.

What makes life better for everyone is competition. Canada's stagnation can be be summed up in a single phrase - lack of competition. Generally, the US has been a free-for-all when it comes to competition and hence its populace enjoys some of the best living standards.

I'll also relate my experience traveling the subway in Asia vs. Manhattan. Asian transit seems like space-age compared to what we have in the West. I think UBI won't save us as the income must come from somewhere. Hiking taxes kills incentives. The better way is to have more freedom/efficiencies in my humble opinion.

In the limit, this is like arguing against the use of wheels. Automation improves labor productivity. Economies that have not invested in capital, have seen labor productivity and incomes stagnant. This is a current debate going on in Canada (especially as compared to the productivity and income gains in the last decade). Canada does have strong Unions, so I wonder if this is related.

Another thing that seems troubling is how a small group of people can hold a majority of the country by the bXlls. Given how this is an election year, I can see this turning into huge fiasco. The rest of the economy is collateral damage.

GGUF files seems to be proliferating. I think some folks (like myself) make an incorrect assumption that the format has more portability/generalizability than it appears to have. Hence, the horror!

I've also been trying to figure out GGUF and the other model formats going around. I'm horrified to see there is no model architecture details in the file! As you say, it seems they are hard-coding the above architectures as constants. If a new hot model comes out, one would need to update the reader code (which has the new model arch implemented). Am I understanding this right?

I'm also a bit confused by the quantization aspect. This is a pretty complex topic. GGML seems to use 16bit as per the article. If was pushing it to 8bit, I reckin I'd see no size improvement the GGML file? The article says they encode quantization versions in that file. Where are they defined?

This is neat to know. On Ollama, I see mistral and mixtral. Is the latter one the MoE model?

I assume you are referring to Llama 2? Is there a way to compare models? e.g. what is Llama-7b equivalent to in OpenAI land? Perplexity scores?

Also, does ChatGPT use GPT 4 under the hood or 3.5?

I am not good at investing (lost money every single time I've tried). Liquid cash gets spent. I am paying off my 5 year fixed mortgage as fast as I can, as I will be up for renewal at the end of next year.

Some people don't have the financial savvy or time to optimize. One size does not fit all.

Immigrants. 95% (made up stat) may be poor but the 5% who are not, can afford to. In Canada, there is a recent narrative which I think is correct that immigrants are driving our inflation. We expanded our population of 30 million by about a million in the last year. That's a million new household formations, and some people bought a buttload of cash.

This was actually a very nice article! Thanks!

I liked the last line the most .. I think we've all gotten accustomed to zero interests, and this has changed our behavior. My father to a large extend screwed up his (and our family's) life because he lived in an era of high rates. He did not understand the world had changed. We could have bought a house for cash in 1995 but he chose to rent. After that, it was always a bubble, with no buying opportunity like 1995 ever.

It makes me wonder if all of us have similarly not realized the world is a different place post rate hikes. There is this inevitable dogma that "rates will go back down". A lot of people are making that bet and I wonder if it is just history again.

What I don't understand is what is driving the US economy today. It seems to be firing on all if not most cylinders. People I know who got laid off are finding work (I hear negative experiences too and feel for those people). Hiring in tech seems like it is picking up.