throwaway_391
Joined 7 years ago
Joined 7 years ago
I said two monitors but what I mean is one for each location - many people I know seem to prefer two but I think it's an antipattern (move your head, instead of alt+tab or similar)
I'm glad it's becoming more common knowledge though. Recruiters have long been redundant compared to job search websites like seek.
They really need to start from scratch and build solid, easily testable product because the current methodology doesn't work.
I especially love the bugs where when in one specific track changes mode typing in the comments section drops keys, or when using 'read aloud' the voice randomly changes gender. Office 365 on a Windows 10 LTSC virtualised host w/ no other software.
If this is the case, do yourself a favor and go and buy two ergonomic screens, keyboards and mice - one for each location.
It'll save you becoming a hunched over laptop gremlin.
They're both buggy as hell, the type of bugs that will make your document render in unintended ways when somebody opens it on the other side. At some point, Word for Mac decided to remove whitespace between words on my resume - I couldn't see them and generally exported to PDF, but I didn't hear back from prospective jobs that asked for a word format specifically.
Office 365 Web and desktop application really need a complete revamp, they have reproducible bugs and horrible UI/UX in edge cases.
I also really hate when Microsoft decides I want to store my sensitive data on their cloud for no apparent reason despite saving to local disk, it really seems like a 'whoops we accidentally did this but you should try it!' kind of move from MS. This is the perfect example of a monolithic application with chronic feature creep.
I still prefer it over YAMLs awkward initial learning curve.
If you're paranoid enough to use a VPN for 'private' traffic, you should probably be running such sessions in a VM using something like the tails live CD.
Basically, researchers started naming vulnerabilities when they thought they mattered. 'Shellshock' and 'EternalBlue' are both deserving of names, IMO.
Then researchers started naming everything, many of the vulnerabilities had zero real world impact, were almost entirely theoretical (many crypto vulns), or required chaining of other attacks to actually achieve anything.
The KNoB description says 'is vulnerable to packet injection by an unauthenticated, adjacent attacker that could result in information disclosure and/or escalation of privileges.' which is sounds extremely caveated. They haven't demonstrated an actual attack so my guess is they've overplayed the significance of the vulnerability entirely and this grants the ability to PITM traffic (which really isn't a defensible boundary, anyway).
Most decent hackers I know laugh at named vulnerabilities unless their technical impact actually matters. Dirty COW took the piss entirely, https://dirtycow.ninja, https://www.zazzle.com/collections/white_theme-1195879626504... .
That's how we ended up with 8-player age of empires 2 deathmatches after hours ;)
Network security is unmaintaniable. Start caring about defensible boundaries instead.
A tactic I've used in the past is buying a burner number (prepaid sim), called recruiters with a fake name, number and resume and asked them to provide details about the job which many of them name completely. The ones that don't generally indicate that other recruiters do exactly what I'm doing to them in order to steal clients.
I don't feel bad about screwing over an industry which has no place in the modern world, particularly when they're opportunistically trying to make a buck from me and/or my future company while adding very, very little value :)