throwaway77384

I don't know if they are listed on the EU alternatives website, but for mail, I find Migadu to be excellent. I think they are Swiss.

I learned vanilla Javascript first. Spent a few years building various frontends / websites that way.

Then came React. I thought knowing Javascript meant I'd know React. Oh boy was I wrong.

I started around the time that class-based components were replaced with hooks and function-based components only.

That meant I had to work in the latter, while all the SO posts were about the former, so I couldn't find any solutions to problems I was facing.

About three years in, I still couldn't explain to you wtf a hook is. I've looked at countless tutorials, used countless hooks from various libraries, but I've never felt the need to make one. Which tells me that I still don't know what problem is fundamentally solved by using / making a hook specifically.

All I understand is writing a function that returns a value or a function that returns a bunch of JSX. I've never needed some sort of mystical third concept that somehow requires me to call it 'use'-something, before I'm allowed to call other things called 'use'-something within it. I wish I could somehow wrap my head around it.

Anyway, learning React, I felt I spent more time trying to work out why things sometimes got updated and sometimes not. It felt insanely arbitrary.

Then comes the joy of trying to force the incredibly non-deterministic rendering of the stack of components into something reasonably deterministic. If you have to call multiple endpoints and track the state of those calls and ensure a component only renders when that data is available in its correct form (which has to happen in a specific sequence), you will spend what seems like an insane amount of time forcing something that is inherently non-sequential into executing sequentially. Seems wild to me.

The amount of time some component tries to access 'undefined' is just astounding.

How about closures? It took me so long to finally understand that useEffect doesn't have access to updated state variables unless they are in the dependency array. So much time spent banging my head against the wall, wondering why my variable is always 'behind' by exactly one state update.

Let's assume you've managed to set all this up, you suddenly find out that React literally re-renders the ENTIRE tree of components sitting on top of any child component, every time anything changes.

Let's imagine a form with multiple inputs:

<form> <input1> <input2> <input3> </form>

If I make a change to input2, the form and all the other inputs are re-rendered. Unless, of course, I wrap each and every input in React.Memo(). If I want my form to handle errors properly, for example by using react-hook-form, I then need to add a custom compare-function for each prop handed into the input, to ensure it updates correctly, but only when needed. What used to be a one-liner <input> has suddenly become 15 lines of code dedicated to working out when to re-render this one input instead of the entire form.

I still haven't used useCallback successfully anywhere in any of my applications, because I'm still not sure I understand what it does or how it works.

Suspense makes sense. Error boundaries are still elusive. I've tried implementing them, but most of the time the only error boundary that really triggers is the one all the way up the tree, which is only one step better than crashing the whole interface when a component encounters an error.

Anyway, so you've finished that whole journey, good job. Enter Next.js. Guess when I started using Next.js? Yup, right around when page-router became the app-router. Same story again, all SO issues are about page-router, so none of the problems I'm encountering have been addressed yet.

How about initialising a Next.JS app in dark-mode to start with? Not possible, because half your app is now server-based components that don't have access to cookies, so it always flashes white first before jumping to dark mode. I suppose I could build my app dark-mode first or save the user's preference in the DB.

Sometimes, it is nice to just store something in localStorage. But, persisting state with Zustand is suddenly hopelessly broken and no amount of hacks around delaying hydration have worked for me so far.

How about changing meta-data of pages, especially if the meta-data relies on a fetch call? How about the fact that the data from that fetch call can't be used in your components, meaning that the fetch call has to be repeated in your component? (But don't worry, Next.js includes black magic to deduplicate fetch calls, pinky-promise that we won't hit every endpoint twice, blowing up your free-tier quota on [insert platform here]).

Caching? Completely arbitrary. Some parts of your app will fetch new data from the server every time, other parts of the app will never update correctly. All depends on who's doing the fetching. If it's a 3rd party service (say, google firebase), then you have to force your api-routes into dynamic rendering before you actually see updated data coming back from fetch calls.

To this day, I haven't managed to get caching working predictably in my app. I literally have no idea when things will revalidate and when not. I've managed to force it into never caching, but a combination of caching when I need it to cache or revalidating every time seems to be impossible to achieve.

So now I am sitting on top of a framework, for a framework, for Javascript, where I neither know when components will update, nor when data will be cached, all because these things are hiding behind magic that is extremely poorly documented (and never seems to include real-world examples of sufficient complexity). It's quite a frustrating experience.

I wouldn't know what the solution to this is. Feels like we've arrived here through years of developer effort and I don't feel qualified to judge it. Therefore, I just put up with it and hope to learn more about it as I build more apps.

I wonder whether people who defend piracy also defend making money with it.

That tends to be where I draw the line (except for perhaps very extenuating circumstances). For me, piracy without profit motive is literally just knowledge / information sharing. I feel as though copyright basically shouldn't exist in cases where someone doesn't profit from reproducing / copying / distributing some kind of content.

As soon as someone starts making money with someone else's creation, it becomes a crime in my view.

I understand that there is nuance to this...what if someone runs a torrent site and needs funding to keep running the site, thus technically creating some kind of cash-flow / revenue stream. I don't really have the answer to that (except perhaps that we should all just use open-source DHT-based torrent searches, so no funding of centralised sites is needed?)

But yeah, in cases where someone is this blatantly operating an IPTV service, it's obvious why they got prosecuted.

Thanks for the information :)

Thank you!

What is RAG in this context? I only know it as red, amber, green...

You are right, my statement was too extreme, borne from frustrations over the degradation of many online services by profit-motives. I'm sure online dating platforms, so long as they get user profiles in front of user eyeballs, are inevitably going to lead to people getting into relationships. Much like with Facebook or, say, news media, the algorithm has a specific purpose and, as we see rather often, that purpose is not "make the user happy", it is "keep the user engaged by any means". So, for a news media website, the purpose is no longer "deliver the best news", but "deliver the most engagement". And that process can be automated by changing content subtly and measuring again, until the content pulls the most attention.

I guess with Tinder, that's not necessarily how it works? Do they have ads on there? No idea. But again, I wouldn't be surprised if there is some kind of data collection / trading going on. But who knows, I have no evidence of this and wouldn't want to badmouth Tinder just because it's trendy to bash big platforms. Please consider this an attempt at making a more balanced comment :)

It's almost insulting how predictably this happened. I do wonder how much more money they made by selling information instead of just having a paid subscription model.

I was one of those people who got into online dating just at the transition from "Only weirdo losers do online dating" -> "The only way to meet anyone is online dating".

So for about two years, I was there, on OKC as sooooo many brand new people discovered it, in a huge city, in my mid-twenties. It was an incredible time. I met so, so many interesting people, who were so similar to me. I couldn't believe it. It was all free, too.

No lasting relationships ever came from it. I met my partner of 10 years at work eventually.

I've never been on Tinder or any other online dating platform, but it sounds like the industry (it is now an industry...) has gone through the same cycle of VC-driven monetisation, removing all incentive for the platform to function correctly in the user's interest, much like any big platform nowadays.

So, I guess we'll need some kind of online dating fediverse to fix this. I'd recommend copying exactly how OKC worked. It was the best approach I've ever seen. But also the only one ;)

So glad to see someone else say this. NextJS 13 was (is) a complete an utter disaster. I took on a reasonable-size project around that time and the documentation was incomplete, no library worked on it. Mystery caching and fetch-call deduplication all over the place. It was horrific. I wonder if things have improved since.

Yup, I couldn't agree more. His music from back in the day is so incredibly unique and nobody has made anything like it before or since. It's impossible to find anything like it. Unfortunately he seems to no longer want to make music like that. If I was a billionaire I'd write him a blank cheque to make more music like his old stuff. But, I'm no musician, maybe he literally can't anymore. I don't know how it works, or how insulting the mere notion would be to him.