throwaway-ai-ai
Joined 7 years ago
Joined 7 years ago
Most research papers in Math / Theoretical CS are < 50 pages, while many IMO problems have solutions > 1 page. So it's only a factor of 50 "more complex."
Then, we should be able to encode open problems / conjectures in Math / Theoretical CS into Lean, run this brute fore approach, and have it start auto generating new publications.
To the best of my knowledge, no one has done this yet.
I think you are arguing for "Not all programming tasks that can be automated away by a bot that can win IOI / ICPC."
However, what I'm asking is: "Does there exist 10% of programming that can be automated away by a bot that can win IOI / ICPC" ?
Furthermore, I think you are also assuming that human programmers remain static, while the AI has to be a 'drop in replacement for humans.' On the other hand, if we look at AWS -- AWS didn't build some AI that is a drop in replacement for sys admin work. AWS built their own API, humans adapted to it.
It seems to me that in a world where such an IOI/ICPC winning bot existed, programmers would adapt to it (just as programmers have adapted to AWS), by figuring out "how can I leverage this API so that I don't have to hire someone to do FOOBAR"
Furthermore, suppose such an open source program existed, how long would it take for it to start replacing remote contractors and then in-office programmers? ["start replacing" as in, say, 10% of human programmers]
these three points are on one line
these three lines intersect at one point
these two lines are parallel
these four points are on a circle
these two angles are equal
etc ...
There are things that absolutely can be done via coordinates, if one can brute force large algebraic expressions.