throwadobe
Joined 2 years ago
Karma
211
Submissions
99
Member since
Jun 13
Recent submissions
Comment · 6 months ago
Comment · 9 months ago
I mean, it's not like I trashed it or compared it to Mozart—I even made sure to include "interesting, stimulating, or tonally remarkable" in an attempt to preempt that latter pushback.
But even if I did, why can't I? It's fine to call some music shit. Just like you can call my opinion shit.
Policing dissenting opinions and saying everything is equally worthy of praise are two sides of the same coin sliding in the vending machine that sells us the sad state of affairs we live in today.
Comment · 9 months ago
I'm not, I promise
Comment · 2 years ago
> I am not familiar with what you’re claiming here about the matter being judged collectively in due time with Brazilian due process - care to share a source?
Top article on G1: https://g1.globo.com/politica/noticia/2024/09/01/primeira-tu...
Translated to English via ChatGPT for you: https://pastebin.com/raw/1KNU6Q3F
These aren't "secret censorship orders". They are a matter of public record.
Also they are perfectly legal. Brazil has a modern "Internet Law" which in its Section III, Article 19 states:
"Art. 19. In order to ensure freedom of expression and prevent censorship, the provider of internet applications can only be subject to civil liability for damages resulting from content generated by third parties if, after an specific court order, it does not take any steps to, within the framework of their service and within the time stated in the order, make unavailable the content that was identified as being unlawful, unless otherwise provided by law."
https://www.cgi.br/pagina/marco-civil-law-of-the-internet-in...
Comment · 2 years ago
Because doctors never misdiagnose or prescribe wrong medications...
I'd rather make my own choices, thank you very much.
Comment · 2 years ago
Looks like this uses DOT? Click on "Editor" at the top
Comment · 2 years ago
I never said they were, but the judge isn't wrong for deciding on legality rather than morality.
You'd think so, but I guess they don't.