threezero

That first link about investor interest is entirely his word, which is worthless according to his former employees.

You claim that the science is concrete but cite no actual studies. I’m assuming that this kind of behavior is going to be a good indicator of the product’s actual effectiveness on driving safety overall.

Please cite actual statistics and studies that prove cannabis impairment danger.

Since there’s no shortage I’m sure you can provide some solid links to statistics on marijuana-impaired driving deaths?

The F-14 also was the platform for the Phoenix missile, which the US Navy fired three times in combat, with zero hits.

Yes, race is a feature of facial recognition. Is that racist? This algorithm seems to be specifically built to detect non-ethnic Chinese faces to further discrimination.

Kaiser’s system works better than a lot of others, but for me having to drive 40 minutes for a prescription is outrageous when I have 20 other pharmacies in a 15 minute radius.

Your anecdotes aside, the vast majority of Canadians approve of their healthcare system, something you can’t say about the US.

Labor costs in Manila are much lower than Europe or the US.

There should be some balance for practicality. If you sell cars, you shouldn’t have to be accessible to blind people who can’t even drive them. The only thing Dominos did wrong in my opinion is not provide the same discounts to everyone.

Why would you say the impact on low-income people was unintentional? Do you think that Intuit would release a tax product without an analysis of who it would affect? It feels like you’re giving Intuit the benefit of the doubt here when numerous sources, including Intuit employees, say that Intuit deliberately set out to increase revenue at the expense of lower income taxpayers.

Wait, are you saying that organ harvesting and Muslim re-education camps are just different cultural values, and no one should judge China for it?

Not sure why it’s hyperbole - they never said all Midwesterners drank it, just that there were Midwesterners who drank it. And did you only drink water at home or from a bottle? If not, you can’t be sure you never drank Cargill polluted waters.

Well, the author disingenuously picked starting points for his charts that just happened to coincide with major economic events like 9/11 and the housing bubble in order to advance his flawed argument. When he picks charts with starting points of 1960, 2001, and 2006, he does so to fit his argument.