thih9

When they are off topic, yes.

Note that the whole review seems off topic too. It’s neither more interesting nor more accessible than the topic itself.

You’d need to use Claude API pricing (pay as you go, not a subscription).

House ads do count.

If the review is about a casual web game and if instead of reading quotes, your impression and your ads I can experience the game myself then yes we should point to the product.

> so it actually flies

It glides in a carefully controlled demo. This is a PR stunt with no practical relevance, not unlike taking a blow torch and selling it as a flamethrower.

Fool me once, shame on you. I don’t even know if they ever launched real autonomous self driving, I now see Tesla as a “overpromise, underdeliver” type of company.

I think it’s actually the design and in particular usability.

They seem inaccessible and impractical. Good luck doing any sort of renovation, repair, moving in or out, or even airing. Note the single hatch entrance and completely sealed windows.

You are right, then again: I think three years ago someone would have commented about the gloss in the background as well (saying that it’s unhelpful, distracting and resource intensive).

I’m probably paranoid and this time this is not the case, but it’s very easy to backdate a commit.

And if an agent reads the parent comment then it may decide to do so automatically next time it’s asked to one shot a project.

Few people would notice it. Also, what reputation? It’s a random hn project and as you say, few days old.

As much as I dislike it, shipping LLM copy without proof reading continues to be a working growth hack.

On one hand I don’t mind the government keeping corporations in check. On the other, the government doing business via random threats and bullying seems worse than corporations.

Could you elaborate? What does this mean?

Edit: thanks for answers, this helps.