theworld572

> Doesn't this just open every job up to insane amounts of competition with the lowest price of living areas in the country

Remote jobs will have a much bigger pool of applicants to choose from, but likewise applicants will have a much bigger jobs to choose from too. So the two should cancel each other out.

Is this an eons-long form of "it was better in the old days"? Just look at primates and other wild animals today to see brutal violence.

> I programmed server-side web forms in ASP.NET and JSP for years before switching to SPAs and React.

I don't think that comparison makes sense? ASP.NET and JSP are server side languages while React is client side.

Backend devs do this as well. You could just as easily start a thread called "Why use MicroServices/Serverless/Kubernetes/NoSQL etc.". Just like SPAs, those things all have a time and a place but unfortunately devs often push for them to be used in order to practice resume-driven-development and so they can play with the shiny new toy that everybody is talking about.

Personally I think SPAs have a time and a place - highly interactive web apps like google docs, facebook, slack etc. should definitely be SPAs. But using React to create a blog site is just ridiculous. Indiehackers.com is a perfect example of a site which would be so much better if it was a plain old statically rendered site. I remember a podcast where the founder of indiehackers said that he used React to build the site because he wasn't happy that the indiehackers business is not technical enough - so using react was a way making it more "techy" even though it actually makes the site worse (he didn't admit that part though). And thats fine for him as he is a solo-entrepreneur, but when developers working on teams take on that mentality it be extremely frustrating for the developers who would rather produce value than produce overly-complicated solutions in order to gain bragging rights.

Scrum.

Financial independence comes down to simply earning as much money as you can while spending as little as possible.

As to how to earn the most money you can, I think that depends a lot on your personal circumstances. But if freelancing hasn't worked out for you then I guess the other options are to get a permanent job or to start your own business. Its impossible for me to say which one is the best option for you though.

I am a developer with a CS degree and think you hit the nail on the head with that observation. There are also plenty of other things developers have to know about now that you didn't have to 20 years ago - security, privacy concerns over data, devops etc.

It's very lazy thinking to resort to a "kids these days" mentality of modern software development.

No, bullying is just a US (and UK) thing. Everything in the US and UK is bad. Everything in Europe is good. We don't have bullying, or smart phone addiction, or family breakdown, or populist leaders, or racial tensions or drug and alcohol problems. We all live harmoniously in Europe, you guys (Americans) can learn a lot from us. </sarcasticcomment>

No, I have not ever seen it work well. I was so frustrated by its prevalence in the industry that it was one of the main reasons why I decided to leave software development and work in cyber security / penetration testing instead.

I have since returned to software dev because the fact is I love coding and development but I try to minimise the time I spend working for companies by only working short term contracts while working on side projects inbetween jobs. If one of my side projects becomes successful and I end up hiring developers then there is no way in hell I will be forcing the horrorshow that is Scrum on them. Yes, yes I know "thats not real Scrum", but that doesn't change the day to day reality of working in teams that follow Scrum, or "Scrum".

"for me" is the key part of the sentence you quoted. If he had said "for everyone" then yes that would have been survivorship bias, but he did not.

Though if you are trying to point out the fact that we might get a skew towards success stories in this thread because those who actually made a success of the dot com crash are more likely to post about it then those who failed then I would probably agree with you.

Is using the word "pussies" trying hard to offend? It seems like a pretty legitimate post, I know many people that think like this guy, only most of them don't read hacker news..

You forgot to add "Well actually" at the start of your sentence.