thesmart

Getting in front of the freight train before it gains momentum is so obvious and yet no one has jumped on that... until now. Very interested!

So we're back to distributed queues on PostgreSQL circa 2006...

Rolling back to 4.6 is such a stark difference

Considering Github seems to have <99% uptime, I'm not super excited to use `gh` for anything. Besides, wasn't able to publish my skill anyway:

gh skill publish shellcraft

X shellcraft: name "shellcraft" does not match directory name "."

Because the B70 cards can pipeline 500 tok/s on concurrent workloads. Apple Silicon and Nvidia consumer cards only work well w/ serial workloads.

The idea that Intel's foundry could replace TSMC is hilarious. No. Maybe a gamer-focused mid-market card based on 30-series.

How about "no." You may be okay giving away your individual rights, including to copyright, but I am not.

Yeah, I'm guessing that probably because in their TOS you grant them some license work-around for running the service, which can mean anything.

I'm ready to abandon Github. Enschitification of the world's source infrastructure is just a matter of time.

WebAssembly is amazing, but I don't think making it a DOM controller is where the action is. What specific scenarios do you aspire to unlock and why would those scenarios lead to broader adoption?

Both

Can we please demand that Github provide mirror APIs to competitors? We're just asking for an extinction-level event. "Oops, our AI deleted the world's open source."

Any public source code hosting service should be able to subscribe to public repo changes. It belongs to the authors, not to Microsoft.

Yes. Feels like every other week.

It's really pathetic for however many trillions MSFT is valued.

If we had a government worth anything, they ought to pass a law that other competitors be provided mirror APIs so that the entire world isn't shut off from source code for a day. We're just asking for a world wide disaster.