Recent submissions

Comment · 13 years ago
This furlough is an attempt to prevent another round of layoffs. Another round of layoffs would cause IBM to reconsider which projects are necessary and start eliminating projects as a whole.

30% pay for 1 week of a 52 week year works out to 0.5% of your salary. It could be worse...

Comment · 13 years ago
http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/z/solutions/cloud/

They are. IBM's mainframe business is quickly becoming a dinosaur, cloud or not.

The furlough is a way to prevent another round of layoffs. By furloughing a division, you can save X%. You cant have two rounds of layoffs within 3 months and not destroy existing projects.

Comment · 13 years ago
estimated $1.6 mil a month for > 12 months? For a meme generator? I'd say they had a good run.
Comment · 13 years ago
Seems like some of these homeowners would pay $30k to not have this program, or for some control over the final product. I could imagine some rich guy paying $15k to keep his section of beach off the program.
Comment · 13 years ago
IBM has had private clouds for a few years now. It's not like AWS where anyone can click and spin up an instance. It's geared towards very large companies. These companies have been reluctant to use AWS, or have specific requirements (hardware requirements, licensing issues, corporate policies). So it's incorrect to say IBM cant build a cloud. IBM's cloud isnt a public facing entity.
Comment · 13 years ago
Wont this just amplify existing trends instead of exposing new ones?
Comment · 13 years ago
Like pushing ads to the phones.
Comment · 13 years ago
few months - year...
Comment · 13 years ago
Quite a few. It puts food on my table.... :)
Comment · 13 years ago
Why would POWER be affected by this decision? Everyone and their mother sells a x86 server. Hard to make a profit when everyone is competing. How many other companies sell POWER hardware?
Comment · 14 years ago
Really? I'd love a new pair of glasses.
Comment · 14 years ago
The 100GB of cloud storage is worth $5 a month/$60 year. I'm hoping Google starts throwing around storage with all their future devices. Maybe on the Nexus 4?
Comment · 14 years ago
I think you underestimated the cost of major cities in UK.
Comment · 14 years ago
Apple apparently abandoned ZFS to adopt specific subsets of the technology. Someone else mentioned 4 GB of the SSD is for write cache (log device). Guessing the other XGB is the traditional cache device.

Should really improve daily usage performance. Makes sense their benchmarks only go to 4GB.

Comment · 14 years ago
My guess it's using some tech similar to ZFS. Creating a 4GB log drive for writing, and the rest as a cache drive. Sounds like they abandoned the adaption of ZFS to make their own interpretation.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton