Recent submissions

Comment · 8 days ago
You might want to look up what "ripoff" means. It hardly looks like it, except for may be the colors in a couple of places.
Comment · 12 days ago
I'm curious how disruptive this would be from a database perspective ? For eg, All the flight bookings to/from Cuba needs to be updated because it would have originally accounted for DST.
Comment · 5 months ago
At least your are living a fulfilling life ridiculing others, that is awesome. /s
Comment · 6 months ago
It's a trap
Comment · 6 months ago
Titlegore
Comment · 1 year ago
> I'm beyond saddened that they are wasting my hard-earned money in this

Lol, What do you mean your hard-earned money ? You already spent your money. It is their money now. Consumer != Investor.

Your equivalent is someone going to their local grocery store and asking them to sell stop selling Avocados because they are allergic.

Comment · 1 year ago
I don't think that is what they are talking about. Users can be sad. But they cannot claim ownership of a money they "spent". It is not their money anymore.
Comment · 1 year ago
It is influenced by the language and culture. For example mask on the face emoji is usually read so. But in some asian cultures it has a religious meaning. These emojis are used while communicating in native language or even in transliteration via english.
Comment · 1 year ago
Not to critique on the article, but as a general suggestion, it would be great if people don't use emojis as a scale. Unless it shows a specific character like number emojis, they are sometimes read differently by people from different language backgrounds. So what the author might be trying to say might lead to misunderstandings.
Comment · 1 year ago
This is a weird way to think about it. You are basically saying a company should not launch something exclusive to their platform or ecosystem, but rather should consider launch a generic product compatible with everything out there. Why would they ? How will they stand different if everyone does that ?

Exclusivity is a basic part of business model. Look at PS4 with exclusive titles. Hell, look at your local store with exclusive products only available in their stores.

I would have agreed with you if Apple had done this for a basic feature like calling. But this sure is a privileged feature and there is nothing wrong in making it exclusive to iPhone (but they haven't you see).

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton