theosp
Joined 16 years ago
Joined 16 years ago
I developed this license https://justdo.com/source-available-license , if someone wants to adopt it for their project, I'd love to provide its Latex form, just DM me. (With enough demand, I might Open Source the Source available license ;) )."
I loved using Claude, I think it did better job than other LLM. Attempts to appeal failed with no response.
You think you can help me figure it out?
We believe strongly in the power of open source and we're preparing to go 'Open Core' by this summer (See Community Edition in the pricing page to see what will be Open Sourced). Our intention is to give back to the community and enable more people to benefit from our tool.
If anyone is interested in exploring more about JustDo or participating in our open-source journey, I'd be more than happy to chat or answer any questions you might have :)
Been in the making for 7 years, is in use by famous big-corps for few years already.
Bi-directional Jira integration built-in.
I am not mentioning the name of the tool simply because the landing page is really not where I want it to be at the moment
If you are looking for a solution in the field can DM me and I'll give you access to the code before we complete all the open source preparation.
Our speciality is that the tool solves both the communication problem (Trello, Asana) and the planning problem (MS Projects). Typical client will have 50-400 active users.
-Daniel
Source please.
Even if guilty, what GS has to do with any debt beyond what it raised for 1mdb (us$6b)?
You write: "Given that GS was the underwriter and allegedly the key enabler of the scandal, punishing GS by making them pay at least the majority of those taxpayer losses seems unjustified or unfair to you? What amount do you believe is fair?"
But from reading the first paragraph under the History section here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1Malaysia_Development_Berhad
it is clear that by the time Goldman started raising money for 1mdb (2012 if i am not mistaken), a lot of money been raised already, i.e. GS wasn't the key enabler.
So why blame Goldman for all the debt accumulated under 1mdb?
[edit: added 'Also, not all the $6 billion disappeared']
So, no, gs are offering nothing at the moment.
From Goldman's q3 report: 'As of the date hereof, the firm has estimated the upper end of the range of reasonably possible aggregate loss for such matters and for any other matters described below where management has been able to estimate a range of reasonably possible aggregate loss to be approximately $1.8 billion in excess of the aggregate reserves for such matters.'
7.5b is more than 10 times the fee collected by Goldman, why stop there?