thegrim22

I assume you have data that backs up your claim that a non-trivial percentage of homeless got hooked, legally, on opiates before turning to fentanyl? Please link it.

Alternatively, Reddit is so useful as a place to push propaganda that it'll never be allowed to fail and will always propped up in one way or the other so maybe it's a safer bet than you'd expect.

I research companies I'd want to work for, look at their site's job page for open positions that match what I want to do, and if there are any, I apply for them through whatever mechanism the company provides.

It's a selective tax break that specifically targets only a certain subset of the population, and not the rest, that would be enacted in an election year, a handful of months before the election occurs.

From the study the article is about: "participants who had recovered from Covid-19 in whom symptoms had resolved in less than 4 weeks or at least 12 weeks had similar small deficits in global cognition as compared with those in the no–Covid-19 group".

So no, it doesn't apply to everyone that has ever caught covid. It's only (allegedly) people who had multiple months of "symptoms" post-covid that had a change in cognitive ability.

So the article and study argue that millennials aren't actually lazy, because it's young people in general that are lazy (about work). Literally. It's a dystopian argument. They're saying that it's nothing specifically to do with a certain generation of people, it's just that young people on average are more lazy now. So millennials aren't lazy, definitely, only young people are, which millennials are, but millennials aren't lazy. It does your head in trying to follow their "logic".

Less demand with same supply = lower prices. The owners either work with the lower prices or if they're so low that it makes sense to replace the office with something else that'd have better returns then that will happen. Pretty simple really.

There's also a political angle since NASA represents the US. If anything goes wrong with a NASA project it's a massive propaganda opportunity for agitators and rival countries to mass spam the internet about how horrible America has become, what a laughing stock, etc., etc., doing everything they can to push their anti-US propaganda as hard as they can. There's more repercussions for NASA to fail at something than a private company.

There's obviously two sides to the issue, right? Or else there wouldn't be any debate. Or else no companies would do RTO. Why is it that in multiple years of reading HN I've never once seen an article that covers the other side's position? Why is it that the reporting is 100%, completely, always biased in one direction? It's like this across whole swaths of topics, not just about RTO.

Wouldn't we prefer forums of communication that were unbiased and which fairly discussed the props/cons of each point of view? Or do we really just prefer the echo chamber / propaganda / dogpile approach?

Where any political content that aligns with the platform's ideology is considered "the truth", not politics, and will be allowed to be spread, whereas any political content that does not align will be deplatformed.

Am I missing something or are there no pictures of the 4000W version, only the 2000W version? The 2000W version's panels encompass the entire footprint of the vehicle so I'm trying to imagine how on Earth you could possibly double the wattage still.

I know it was only one piece of the article that talks about RTO, but as an aside, I don't think I've ever once in my life, in person or online, seen someone arguing for remote work that provided even a single piece of data, a single number, to back up their assertions. Their arguments instead just presuppose that RTO is awful and remote work is amazing, as if everyone "just knows" it. And apparently everybody that's involved with RTO is supposedly just a complete idiot that doesn't know anything about their business, or, as hinted at in the article, they're involved in some sort of grand conspiracy to force an "ineffective" RTO on workers for conspiratorial reasons.

The vast majority of (radio) SETI relies on primarily searching for intentional, powerful, repeating, beacons/signals. We have scores of unexplained, suspicious looking signals that we just discard because the signals never repeated and so we'll never know what they were and can't ever make any conclusion about them. The only really unambiguous signal we can detect is a powerful repeating beacon, and so that's all we really look for. Also, any "random" non-beacon leakage another civilization might internally produce is expected to be too low-powered for us to pick up hundreds or thousands of light-years away. Nobody in their right mind would design their internal communications to be so insanely inefficient that they'd be blasting it strongly, unambiguously, potentially omnidirectionally, for us hundreds/thousands of light years away to detect. What an insane waste of energy that would be.

If they want fewer people they obviously aren't doing a good job considering the population increases every single year.

Maybe the morals our societies have held for hundreds/thousands of years around moral decency and civility had a point. But I guess I'm glad you're wiser than all the generations that came before you, and you know better than all of them.