thatfunkymunki

agreed, zero-trust solution with proper endpoint security and PKI is superior to transport encryption and insecure protocols

Significant parts of my tech school (1B4X1) were under NDA back in 2015.

yes, this has been my preferred approach as well. Too much risk of very deep local maxima otherwise.

I've heard it being described as an iterated prisoner's dilemma and very many people are very publicly defecting.

my neighborhood here (excelsior district) is more or less like a more packed in version of where i grew up (south oak park). Comparing living anywhere in SF to living in Lanwdale or Englewood is absolutely wild, outside of some very isolated neighborhoods.

this is hilariously, almost unbelievably bad

I've lived in Chicago and San Francisco, both places also victims of this type of narrative.

it's not "just to get that data", it's to confirm level of access, check for potential other exploiters or security software, identify the machine you have access to, identify what the machine has network connectivity to, etc. The attacker then maintains the c2 channel and can then perform their actual objective with the help of the data they have obtained.

interesting that the most balanced one is extremely similar to the default, which is not so:

> \#198 (\texttt{QNBRKBNR})is the most balanced, with both evaluation and asymmetry near zero... Remarkably, the classical starting position-despite centuries of cultural selection-lies far from the most balanced configuration.

really enjoyed reading this and learning about <ruby>.

i thought it was the symbol for gradient?

edit: ah, the name of the symbol for the gradient operator is nabla

I went to a similar museum in Japan, in Arima Onsen. It was a fun, hidden gem.

it looks like you can order the cube one on amazon right now.

This is incorrect, I am currently using both nanoKVM USB and PCI models today