Recent submissions

Comment · 4 years ago
> todays pipelines include a whole new level of security that was pretty much ignored in 2005.

The very opposite.

> Security adds complexity

If anything, complexity is the enemy of security

Comment · 4 years ago
Indeed all of those things existed and they weren’t in widespread use because 99% of organization did not need them. And it hasn't changed.

> 2 sysadmins were absolutely not managing “large scale deployments with multiple data centers”

Please don't make things up because I was there.

> But today it’s actually super plausible that 2 or 3 Devops with modern tooling can manage all of that.

Not really.

Comment · 4 years ago
I was working on large scale deployments with multiple datacenters, multiple databases, message passing networks and running multiple customer-facing products.

Load balancers and HA setups were already in use. LVS existed. VMs were popular. "CI/CD" existed, without that name.

> 2005 your average box ...

Speak for yourself.

Comment · 4 years ago
2005: your infrastructure is automated using a handful of Bash, Perl and Python scripts written by two system administrators. They are custom, sometimes brittle and get rewritten every 5 years.

2022: your infrastructure is automated using 10 extremely complex devops tools. You automated the two system administrators away - but then had to hire 5 DevOps engineers paid 2x more. The total complexity is 10x.

They wrote YAML, TOML, plus Ansible, Pulumi, Terraform scripts. They are custom, sometimes brittle and get rewritten every 3 years.

EDIT: to the people claiming that today's infra does more things... No, I'm comparing stuff with the same levels of availability, same deployment times, same security updates.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton