Recent submissions

Comment · 2 years ago
Also a very interesting explanation of all the quirks of this sport by someone who has competed in it:

https://youtu.be/zfaK4Hz0Na8

It actually made me appreciate how impressive and serious this discipline is, despite all the funky-looking gear.

Comment · 2 years ago
Super interesting! But I feel like there is a bit of a conclusion missing for me.

So 1500 Photons hit the receiver per bit send, but this is obviously way to few to keep processing the signal and it will just be drowned out by noise? Where do we go from here? Does voyager repeat its signal gazillions of times so we can average out the noise on our end? Where can I find more information on what is done with these few photons?

Comment · 3 years ago
Comment · 4 years ago
Where has Musk told the story?
Comment · 4 years ago
Danish-Swedish investigators estimated the explosion to be equivalent to 500kg of TNT. That hardly sounds like a three men job to me.
Comment · 4 years ago
Yes, Youtube litters search results with completely unrelated "recommended videos".

One trick to get rid of them is to select one/any additional search filter (for example select HD only).

It is absolutely ridiculous that you have to do this, but it works for now.

Comment · 4 years ago
Comment · 4 years ago
Comment · 4 years ago
You can't just snap your finger and say "we go 100% renewables now!". Germany is probably one of the country that commits the strongest to transitioning to renewables right now, and we started that process in 2011 and expect to reach 100% renewables between 2035 and 2040 the earliest. In the meantime, you HAVE to use another source.

That is 30 years for which you have decide to etiher use fossil fuels or nuclear. So do you wan't to dump CO2 into the air for 30 years and further advance climate change, plus kill millions due to air pollution? Or do you want to accumulate nuclear waste for 30 years, but have way fewer deaths and you don't worsen climate change further?

It is not a nice choice, but it is a choice that has to be made. And Germany decided to choose fossil fuels instead of nuclear.

Comment · 4 years ago
I don't think there is a moral debate about developing autonomous military drones in China.

These self-restrictions based on morality regarding the development of military drones is really something only some western nations do. Other countries, if they reach the capabilites to develop them, they just do.

Comment · 4 years ago
I understand that, but really you have the option of either going all-in on nuclear and potentially making patches of several km² uninhabitable, or going all-in on fossil fuels and making gigantic regions of the earth uninhabitable due to climate change.

It is a choice between a very local problem or a global one. There is no free lunch.

Comment · 4 years ago
Comment · 4 years ago
Comment · 4 years ago
You make it seem like todays internet monopolies exist because of all the platform there are, they are the most well-designed ones, and they would simply be replaced if a better product came along.

I disagree with that, youtube for example is not the prevalent video platform today because it is better than its competitors. Youtube today is absolutely terrible.

But it does not get replaced, because it is the established platform, and using a competitor is suicide because your content will never get any traction.

So we are stuck with a horribly monopolized web, where the established websites can become very shitty, but you have to stay on them because everyone else is.

Comment · 4 years ago
> Because it is not TOPICS that are censored. It is BEHAVIOR.

This post gives an interesting perspective, but this statement cannot be right.

There are absolutely topics, that, no matter how civil you approach them, will result in a ban.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton