taway_1212
Joined 10 years ago
Joined 10 years ago
Excellent comment BTW.
This approach makes the job contract fair - the boss pays you the minimum amount (or close to it) that you find acceptable, and in exchange you work the minimum amount (or close to it) that he considers acceptable. No reasonable businessman expects you to be killing yourself while working for him - they certainly can _hope_ that you will, but they know that it requires a sucker.
On the contrary - for example, lots of people develop on MacOS and deploy to Linux.
Typically, at least in large organizations, the manager is interested in increasing, not decreasing, his budget. Since everything that happens in modern companies is very opaque (i.e. how much actual value is created is not clear for people outside a given business unit), the budget size/headcount is often used as a proxy for value. So, according to this logic, the bigger the headcount, the more important for the company the manager must be, so he can then negotiate a raise, bonus, or a promotion for himself. I agree with Michael O. Church here - managers in tech are mostly one-man PR firms (managing their own reputation). That sucks, but that's the result of our current workplaces in tech getting so complex that judging actual merit is close to impossible.