take_a_breath
Joined 7 years ago
Joined 7 years ago
==I don't think giving dangerous heatwaves whimsical names is any kind of honest 'science communication.'==
We do it all the time for other weather events, specifically for communication purposes. I'm not sure people think of hurricane names as "whimsical" rather a way to understand specific details about a specific weather event.
==What you want is people taking effective action.==
And what might that "effective action" entail?
Edit: We told citizens about Pearl Harbor and 9/11 attacks and it caused panic, sleep depravation, and stress. Why is this risk different?
The rate of new business creation is higher in Europe than the US. I would guess that the US has more venture-backed entrepreneurs, but more businesses are being start by Europeans than Americans.
“The net rate of business creation among the EU economies has been over three times faster than in the USA and Canada since the financial crisis, according to research by RSM International, the seventh largest global network of independent audit, tax and consulting firms.”
== https://www.businessawardseurope.com/news/item/rate-of-new-b...
Oftentimes, something is far easier to type than it is to do. If you have a reliable way of implementing self-control this simply, please share it.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_employee-owned_compa...
I don't see anybody suggesting it would. On the other hand, we can't know the negative impact until we study it. Once we study something, we can add it to the list, and stack rank based on cost-benefit.
Same is true in the US. We just changed to tax code to make it even more beneficial to be a business over a salaried-employee. Did you apply the same skepticism for the US numbers?