tag2103

It is almost like there's some agenda behind these farcical "studies"

Would a different argument be - which is worse, the energy innefficency of vintage - or the massive amounts of waste produced by modern efficient crap that is disposable.

Why would anyone reward bad behavior?

Why would anyone install software that the owner himself said is unsafe to use?

Well said

Week late too- Judgement day was last week. Guess they got the memo late.

My money is on the wholesale paperclip market exploding next week.

This is starting to establish a bad actor pattern.

Knew Anthropic were the bad guys.

Bye bye Max plan and Anthropic. Too much noise on Anthropic's billing woes as of late and tbh Codex with newest version is scratching my AI itch. Of course YMMV but at least with OpenAI no surprise billings (as of yet) for the past 4 months.

Rhetorical question- but what is it going to take for the IT Community to start treating Gmail and the rest of the "too big to block" as adversarial entities and actually block them for their bad behavior. Pie in the sky I know.

Nothing- they are just hoping this will blow over.

I wonder if that's on purpose to poison the release. Would make sense. At least it is towards the end of the article.

Major points are also missed. The fee is enabled at the federal law level: 49 U.S.C. § 114 & 49 U.S.C. § 44901