tacLog
Joined 7 years ago
Joined 7 years ago
I know of eviction moratoriums that occurred after covid. It was sold as a way to avoid a massive surge in displaced people from job loss.
At the time I thought it was strange that this was the best solution because as you said it put the cost on landlords which in my opinion hurts smaller landlords the most.
I don't really see what else could have been the cause but I guess I will rephrase:
- Why do you think this tool was used if not for Covid? (It was as least sold to the public that way right)
- Do you think now that it's been done once that it will happen again?
I am NOT saying we should build this free housing in one area and stick people there: (see the many failed public housing attempts) But there are more options available than everyone getting free housing in the bay area, CA.
How do you buy a car on a loan for example?
It's not perfect but unlike both your examples it isn't based on things that could be consider political. You can't lower your credit score by attending a protest for example. Or posting things for or against causes on the internet.
I am just honestly wondering what else is our there? It has always seemed like a tool that can be used by both individuals and lenders.
Maybe the cooling and power delivery difference between laptop formfactors and PC formfactors will be less with these new arm based chips.
This just isn't what the tweet shows? Unless you are counting AdSense as sponsors? That doesn't seems to make sense.
You seem to be saying LTT is beholden to their sponsors? There is always an argument to be made there but misrepresenting: floatplane, AdSense and other sources that I don't see how you can call sponsors, which make up another 33% seems very disingenuous.
Unless I am misinformed about how AdSense works.
I wonder what the $/kg before we can just send up solar panels that last 100+ years and provide continuous microwave beams of clean energy to ground stations.
But also this is the price to orbit. As the escape velocity is 1.5x higher we can probably assume the same or a greater increase in cost. Maybe you could just justify a really high orbit? It would take a long time for it to build up.
Mass of earth: 5.972 × 10^24 kg
Launch capacity per year: 15,500 tons
Years to get rid of earth: 385,290,322,580,645,161 years.
I think if we every have to worry about this it becomes more a question of where are we going? And do we have enough carbon to cycle for fuel to do this.
I don't think it is impossible that launch capabilities become safe enough to lower the risk to something some people might consider acceptable. However the physics of it won't change. To even get into earths orbit we have to accelerate anything going up to an average of 7.8 Km/s, where to escape orbit to anywhere else it's 11.8 Km/s.
I think the amount of energy to do that will always be the primary reason why this just isn't practical. Assuming you are advanced enough to be considering this, I would hope that your society is stable enough for long term containment and processing.
Or with decent operational security can you purchase and activate airtags in an untraceable way?
If you can that undermines your point, however if you can't then your making a very good point.
I wasn't really expecting to be having novel ideas here and as usual someone built something close and someone on hackernews can tell me about it.
This service isn't perfect and doesn't seem very kid friendly to me. But it exists and is free so it's something to learn from and recommend.
I love libraries and the experience they provide. These memories are core to who I am today.
For me this is about access. I want every kid who doesn't live near a library or who's parents don't have the time to take them there to have something more than nothing.
I don't think that we can make it remote without taking a lot of the magic out of it. But I don't think it's a bad idea to talk about what we might do to try.