ta0967
Joined 12 years ago
Joined 12 years ago
i don't think so, i simply refuse to have my arguments framed that way since i'm very well aware of the shortcomings present in what has so far passed for a "RDBMS". i consider velocitypsycho's argument ("Thinking RDBMS is a silver bullet is just as bad as thinking a document database is a silver bullet.") a non-sequitur: the former is a proper superset of the latter, that sentence simply "does not compute".
doubled down on SQL as the silver bullet
where does the post you replied to mention SQL? are you confusing SQL for the relational model?
if you like hierarchical databases (data trees), consider that relational database gives you a forest: you can treat any datum as your tree root and bloom from there. with hierarchical, you're tied to a single pre-designated root.
both relational and hierarchical databases let you go from department to employee, only one lets you go from employee to their department without enumeration. what purpose does precluding the latter serve?
unfortunately, this industry is dominated by cocky PFYs (of any age) convinced they don't need to study history of their field and, as a result, don't even recognize they're repeating 50 years old mistakes. sure, SQL has fallen so short of the promise of the relational model it's not even funny, but don't conflate the model with the query language, folks!
Use the file name "-" (a single dash) to use stdin instead of a given file.
Alternately, the file name "." (a single period) may be specified instead of
"-" to use stdin in non-blocking mode to allow reading server output while
stdin is being uploaded.one's homosexuality may improve fitness of one's family: if we're brothers and i'm homosexual, we won't be splitting resources between your and my children, and i'll be an extra "parent" looking after your kids. genetically speaking, that is still a (qualified) success for me.
also, genes don't give a damn about individual's reproduction, and local optima are rampant.
edit: what siblings have said.
from the curl(1) manpage:
-X, --request <command>
(...)
Normally you don't need this option. All sorts of GET, HEAD, POST and PUT requests are rather
invoked by using dedicated command line options.
This option only changes the actual word used in the HTTP request, it does not alter the way
curl behaves. So for example if you want to make a proper HEAD request, using -X HEAD will not
suffice. You need to use the -I, --head option.
The method string you set with -X will be used for all requests, which if you for example use
-L, --location may cause unintended side-effects when curl doesn't change request method
according to the HTTP 30x response codes - and similar.
PUT is indicated by using -T / --upload-file, POST by -d / --data or any --data-foo option (eg. --data-raw).
DELETE is the only HTTP method in the parent list that needs -X to be used."They had dark roast so I got you nothing as requested."
IOW, this program is either incomplete or wrong. Cf. "Get me the darkest roast they have." - ifless, concise, robust.
this should not be construed as an argument in support of /bin/sh.
same when going to http://portlandtribune.com/
what's up?
syntax is important! ;)